NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 730

versus

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Différences

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 730

La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 8 mois plus tard
2.2x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 49 Watt versus 110 Watt
320x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 1600 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s

Date de sortie	18 June 2014 versus 9 October 2012
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	49 Watt versus 110 Watt
Vitesse de mémoire	1600 MHz versus 5.4 GB/s

Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

Environ 33% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 928 MHz versus 700 MHz
times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 59.2 billion / sec versus 14.43 GTexel / s
2x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 384
2.1x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 1,425 gflops versus 692.7 gflops
Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
3x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 2527 versus 830
Environ 64% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 416 versus 253
2.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 7900 versus 2902
2.1x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 23.168 versus 10.872
3.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 592.345 versus 166.832
2.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 2.141 versus 0.817
2.3x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 28.29 versus 12.415
Environ 28% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 47.404 versus 36.916
2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3948 versus 1951
2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3707 versus 1693
2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3948 versus 1951
2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3707 versus 1693
2.7x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 881 versus 327

Caractéristiques
Vitesse du noyau	928 MHz versus 700 MHz
Taux de remplissage de la texture	59.2 billion / sec versus 14.43 GTexel / s
Pipelines	768 versus 384
Performance á point flottant	1,425 gflops versus 692.7 gflops
Processus de fabrication	28 nm versus 40 nm
Référence
PassMark - G3D Mark	2527 versus 830
PassMark - G2D Mark	416 versus 253
Geekbench - OpenCL	7900 versus 2902
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	23.168 versus 10.872
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	592.345 versus 166.832
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	2.141 versus 0.817
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	28.29 versus 12.415
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	47.404 versus 36.916
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	3948 versus 1951
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3707 versus 1693
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3335 versus 3324
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	3948 versus 1951
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3707 versus 1693
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3335 versus 3324
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	881 versus 327

Comparer les références

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

830

2527

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

253

416

Geekbench - OpenCL

GPU 1

GPU 2

2902

7900

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

10.872

23.168

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

166.832

592.345

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

0.817

2.141

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

12.415

28.29

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

36.916

47.404

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1951

3948

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1693

3707

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3324

3335

GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1951

3948

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

1693

3707

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3324

3335

3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score

GPU 1

GPU 2

327

881

Nom	NVIDIA GeForce GT 730	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
PassMark - G3D Mark	830	2527
PassMark - G2D Mark	253	416
Geekbench - OpenCL	2902	7900
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	10.872	23.168
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	166.832	592.345
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	0.817	2.141
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	12.415	28.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	36.916	47.404
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	1951	3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	1693	3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3324	3335
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	1951	3948
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	1693	3707
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3324	3335
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	327	881

Comparer les caractéristiques

	NVIDIA GeForce GT 730	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti
Essentiel
Architecture	Fermi	Kepler
Nom de code	GF108	GK106
Date de sortie	18 June 2014	9 October 2012
Prix de sortie (MSRP)	$59.99	$149
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance	1311	846
Prix maintenant	$54.99	$169.99
Genre	Desktop	Desktop
Valeur pour le prix (0-100)	20.48	18.72
Infos techniques
Vitesse du noyau	700 MHz	928 MHz
Performance á point flottant	692.7 gflops	1,425 gflops
Processus de fabrication	40 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	384	768
Taux de remplissage de la texture	14.43 GTexel / s	59.2 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	49 Watt	110 Watt
Compte de transistor	585 million	2,540 million
Noyaux CUDA		768
Température maximale du GPU		105 °C
Sorties et ports de vidéo
Connecteurs d’écran	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA	2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini...
Contribution d’audio pour HDMI		Internal
HDCP
HDMI
Résolution VGA maximale		2048x1536
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Longeur	145 mm	5.7" (14.5 cm)
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires	None	One 6-pin
Soutien de bus		PCI Express 3.0
Hauteur		4.376" (11.1 cm)
Soutien API
DirectX	12.0 (11_0)	12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL	4.6	4.3
Mémoire
RAM maximale	1 GB	1 GB
Bande passante de la mémoire	40.1 GB / s	86.4 GB / s
Largeur du bus mémoire	64 Bit	128 Bit
Vitesse de mémoire	1600 MHz	5.4 GB/s
Genre de mémoire	GDDR5	GDDR5
Technologies
3D Blu-Ray
3D Gaming
3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
TXAA