NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 730 and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 730

• Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• Around 27% higher core clock speed: 700 MHz vs 550 MHz
• 3x more pipelines: 384 vs 128
• Around 97% better floating-point performance: 692.7 gflops vs 352.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 65 nm
• Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 49 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 833 vs 452
• 3.1x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 252 vs 81

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

• 2.4x more texture fill rate: 35.2 GTexel / s vs 14.43 GTexel / s

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 730
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3700M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	833 452
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	252 81
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3324 3315
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3324 3315

Compare specifications (specs)