NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M vs NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M and NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 80% higher core clock speed: 810 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 2.2x more boost clock speed: 980 MHz vs 450 MHz
- 2.9x more texture fill rate: 15.68 GTexel / s vs 5.4 GTexel / s
- 32x more pipelines: 384 vs 12
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 130 nm
- Around 98% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 89 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 256 MB
- Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 1802 MHz vs 1200 MHz
- 5.7x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 793 vs 138
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 April 2013 vs 24 February 2005 |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz vs 450 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 15.68 GTexel / s vs 5.4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 12 |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 130 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 89 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 256 MB |
Memory clock speed | 1802 MHz vs 1200 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 793 vs 138 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
- Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 198 vs 149
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 198 vs 149 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 793 | 138 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 149 | 198 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 3866 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.392 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 157.479 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.864 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.101 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.77 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1589 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3235 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1589 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3235 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 345 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | NVIDIA GeForce Go 6800 Ultra | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Curie |
Code name | GK107 | NV41 |
Launch date | 1 April 2013 | 24 February 2005 |
Place in performance rating | 1301 | 910 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | 450 MHz |
Core clock speed | 810 MHz | 450 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 130 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 12 |
Texture fill rate | 15.68 GTexel / s | 5.4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 89 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 222 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | large |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 9.0c |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 256 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 600 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1802 MHz | 1200 MHz |
Memory type | DDR3 | 256 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus |