NVIDIA Quadro K610M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro K610M and NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K610M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
- Around 21% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 810 MHz
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 30 Watt vs 45 Watt
- Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 1802 MHz
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 218 vs 149
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 182.093 vs 157.479
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 vs 1 April 2013 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 810 MHz |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt vs 45 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz vs 1802 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 218 vs 149 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 182.093 vs 157.479 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
- 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
- 2x better floating-point performance: 752.6 gflops vs 376.3 gflops
- 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
- Around 14% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 798 vs 700
- Around 94% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3875 vs 1996
- 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 44.77 vs 20.881
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 1589 vs 1123
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3235 vs 2253
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3339 vs 3195
- Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1589 vs 1123
- Around 44% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3235 vs 2253
- Around 5% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3339 vs 3195
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 192 |
| Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops vs 376.3 gflops |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 1 GB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 798 vs 700 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3875 vs 1996 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 44.77 vs 20.881 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1589 vs 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3235 vs 2253 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3339 vs 3195 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1589 vs 1123 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3235 vs 2253 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3339 vs 3195 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro K610M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA Quadro K610M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 700 | 798 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 218 | 149 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1996 | 3875 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 182.093 | 157.479 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0 | 0.864 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 20.881 | 44.77 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 1123 | 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 2253 | 3235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3195 | 3339 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 1123 | 1589 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 2253 | 3235 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3195 | 3339 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 9.392 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 16.101 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 345 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA Quadro K610M | NVIDIA GeForce GT 740M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | GK208 | GK107 |
| Launch date | 23 July 2013 | 1 April 2013 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $229.99 | |
| Place in performance rating | 1301 | 1303 |
| Price now | $75 | |
| Type | Mobile workstation | Laptop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 11.43 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 810 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 376.3 gflops | 752.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 192 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 15.68 GTexel / s | 15.68 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 30 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1270 Million | 1,270 million |
| Boost clock speed | 980 MHz | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Display Port | 1.2 | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | MXM-A (3.0) | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Shader Model | 5 | |
| Vulkan | ||
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 20.8 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2600 MHz | 1802 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision Pro | ||
| Mosaic | ||
| nView Display Management | ||
| Optimus | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA Quadro K610M with others
NVIDIAQuadro K610M vs
AMDRadeon HD 7660G IGP
NVIDIAQuadro K610M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740M
NVIDIAQuadro K610M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 630 Rev. 2
NVIDIAQuadro K610M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 920M
NVIDIAQuadro K610M vs
AMDRadeon R5 340X OEM
NVIDIAQuadro K610M vs
AMDRadeon R5 M435
