NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
• Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2255 vs 1094
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3133 vs 2253
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 3176
• 2.1x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2255 vs 1094
• Around 39% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3133 vs 2253
• Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 3176

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M

• Around 14% higher texture fill rate: 30.4 billion / sec vs 26.78 GTexel / s
• Around 14% better floating-point performance: 729.6 gflops vs 642.8 gflops
• Around 11% higher memory clock speed: 2000 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 33% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1452 vs 1095
• Around 49% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 268 vs 180
• Around 16% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4037 vs 3468
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.837 vs 10.489
• 2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 405.086 vs 202.905
• Around 66% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.098 vs 0.66
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 21.798 vs 8.184
• Around 75% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 33.754 vs 19.323

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1095 1452
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	180 268
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3468 4037
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.489 10.837
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	202.905 405.086
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.66 1.098
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.184 21.798
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.323 33.754
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2255 1094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3133 2253
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3176
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2255 1094
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3133 2253
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 3176

Compare specifications (specs)