NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 6 year(s) 4 month(s) later
- Around 45% higher core clock speed: 837 MHz vs 576 MHz
- 3x more pipelines: 384 vs 128
- Around 86% better floating-point performance: 642.8 gflops vs 345.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 90 nm
- 3.4x lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 155 Watt
- 2.7x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 768 MB
- 2x more memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1100 vs 579
- Around 96% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 180 vs 92
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 April 2013 vs 8 November 2006 |
| Core clock speed | 837 MHz vs 576 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 128 |
| Floating-point performance | 642.8 gflops vs 345.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 90 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 155 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 768 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1100 vs 579 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 180 vs 92 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 vs 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 vs 3349 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX
- Around 37% higher texture fill rate: 36.8 billion / sec vs 26.78 GTexel / s
| Texture fill rate | 36.8 billion / sec vs 26.78 GTexel / s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1100 | 579 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 180 | 92 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 3468 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.489 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 202.905 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.66 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 8.184 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 19.323 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2255 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3133 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3352 | 3349 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2255 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3133 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3352 | 3349 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
| Code name | GK107 | G80 |
| Launch date | 1 April 2013 | 8 November 2006 |
| Place in performance rating | 1280 | 1283 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $599 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 837 MHz | 576 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 642.8 gflops | 345.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 90 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 128 |
| Texture fill rate | 26.78 GTexel / s | 36.8 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt | 155 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 681 million |
| CUDA cores | 575 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Length | 270 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 768 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 28.8 GB / s | 86.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
| Standard memory configuration | DDR3 / GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 8800 GTX
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 2800M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745M vs
ATIFirePro M7820
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8650G
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745M vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 640 Rev. 2
NVIDIAGeForce GT 745M vs
AMDRadeon R5 235 OEM
