NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M and NVIDIA Quadro 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
• Around 34% higher core clock speed: 837 MHz vs 625 MHz
• Around 34% higher texture fill rate: 26.78 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
• Around 34% better floating-point performance: 642.8 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• Around 38% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 62 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 16% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1096 vs 946
• Around 3% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.489 vs 10.229
• Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.323 vs 19.02
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2255 vs 1600
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3133 vs 1682
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 2668
• Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2255 vs 1600
• Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3133 vs 1682
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 2668

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000

• Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• Around 67% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 vs 180
• Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3884 vs 3439
• Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 258.26 vs 202.905
• Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.885 vs 0.66
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.688 vs 8.184

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1096 946
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	180 301
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	3439 3884
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.489 10.229
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	202.905 258.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	0.66 0.885
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.184 13.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.323 19.02
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2255 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3133 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 2668
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2255 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3133 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3352 2668

Compare specifications (specs)