NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M vs NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M and NVIDIA Quadro 2000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 3 month(s) later
  • Around 34% higher core clock speed: 837 MHz vs 625 MHz
  • Around 34% higher texture fill rate: 26.78 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 384 vs 192
  • Around 34% better floating-point performance: 642.8 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
  • Around 38% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 62 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
  • Around 15% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1091 vs 947
  • Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.489 vs 10.267
  • Around 2% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 19.323 vs 19.02
  • Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2255 vs 1600
  • Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3133 vs 1682
  • Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3352 vs 2668
  • Around 41% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 2255 vs 1600
  • Around 86% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3133 vs 1682
  • Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3352 vs 2668
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 April 2013 vs 24 December 2010
Core clock speed 837 MHz vs 625 MHz
Texture fill rate 26.78 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s
Pipelines 384 vs 192
Floating-point performance 642.8 gflops vs 480.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 40 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt vs 62 Watt
Maximum memory size 2 GB vs 1 GB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 1091 vs 947
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 10.489 vs 10.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 19.323 vs 19.02
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2255 vs 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3133 vs 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 vs 2668
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2255 vs 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3133 vs 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 vs 2668

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro 2000

  • Around 44% higher memory clock speed: 2600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
  • Around 68% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 301 vs 179
  • Around 13% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 3902 vs 3439
  • Around 27% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 258.26 vs 202.905
  • Around 34% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 0.885 vs 0.66
  • Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 13.688 vs 8.184
Specifications (specs)
Memory clock speed 2600 MHz vs 1800 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 301 vs 179
Geekbench - OpenCL 3902 vs 3439
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 258.26 vs 202.905
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.885 vs 0.66
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 13.688 vs 8.184

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro 2000

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
1091
947
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
179
301
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
3439
3902
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
10.489
10.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
202.905
258.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
0.66
0.885
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8.184
13.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
19.323
19.02
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2255
1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3133
1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
2668
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
2255
1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3133
1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3352
2668
Name NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M NVIDIA Quadro 2000
PassMark - G3D Mark 1091 947
PassMark - G2D Mark 179 301
Geekbench - OpenCL 3439 3902
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 10.489 10.267
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 202.905 258.26
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.66 0.885
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 8.184 13.688
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 19.323 19.02
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 2255 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3133 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3352 2668
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 2255 1600
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3133 1682
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3352 2668
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 0

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GT 745M NVIDIA Quadro 2000

Essentials

Architecture Kepler Fermi
Code name GK107 GF106
Launch date 1 April 2013 24 December 2010
Place in performance rating 1287 1290
Type Laptop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $599
Price now $87.99
Value for money (0-100) 17.65

Technical info

Core clock speed 837 MHz 625 MHz
Floating-point performance 642.8 gflops 480.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 384 192
Texture fill rate 26.78 GTexel / s 20 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 45 Watt 62 Watt
Transistor count 1,270 million 1,170 million

Video outputs and ports

7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support Up to 3840x2160
eDP 1.2 signal support Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
HDMI
LVDS signal support Up to 1920x1200
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
VGA аnalog display support Up to 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Laptop size medium sized
Length 178 mm
Supplementary power connectors None

API support

DirectX 12 API 12.0 (11_0)
OpenCL 1.1
OpenGL 4.5 4.6

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 28.8 GB / s 41.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 2600 MHz
Memory type DDR3, GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0
Standard memory configuration DDR3 / GDDR5

Technologies

3D Vision
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
Blu-Ray 3D Support
CUDA
Direct Compute
FXAA
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
Optimus