Intel HD Graphics 5300 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
Comparative analysis of Intel HD Graphics 5300 and NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 5300
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 month(s) later
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 28 nm
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
- 16.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 709 vs 42
- 12.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 693 vs 55
- 22.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1627 vs 72.2
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 vs 8 November 2013 |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 709 vs 42 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 693 vs 55 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1627 vs 72.2 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
- 9.3x more core clock speed: 926 MHz vs 100 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 384 vs 24
- 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2483 vs 709
- 4.9x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3406 vs 693
- 2.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4045 vs 1627
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 926 MHz vs 100 MHz |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 24 |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2483 vs 709 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3406 vs 693 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4045 vs 1627 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: Intel HD Graphics 5300
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | Intel HD Graphics 5300 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 392 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 181 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 1520 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 709 | 2483 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 709 | 42 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 693 | 3406 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 693 | 55 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1627 | 4045 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1627 | 72.2 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.451 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 370.814 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.075 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.902 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.557 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| Intel HD Graphics 5300 | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Generation 8.0 | Kepler |
| Code name | Broadwell GT2 | GK107 |
| Launch date | 5 September 2014 | 8 November 2013 |
| Place in performance rating | 1454 | 1455 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 900 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 100 MHz | 926 MHz |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 24 | 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,300 million | 1,270 million |
| Floating-point performance | 711.2 gflops | |
| Texture fill rate | 29.63 GTexel / s | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x1 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
Memory |
||
| Memory bus width | 64 / 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Shared memory | 1 | |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 80.26 GB / s | |
| Memory clock speed | 5016 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare Intel HD Graphics 5300 with others
IntelHD Graphics 5300 vs
NVIDIAQuadro 410
IntelHD Graphics 5300 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 735M
IntelHD Graphics 5300 vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
IntelHD Graphics 5300 vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11 Mobile
IntelHD Graphics 5300 vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)
IntelHD Graphics 5300 vs
AppleA12Z Bionic
