NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition versus NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition and NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 1 ans 7 mois plus tard
- 2.7x plus de pipelines: 384 versus 144
- 2.8x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 711.2 gflops versus 253.4 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- 2.8x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 5016 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- Environ 96% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.451 versus 5.332
- Environ 80% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 370.814 versus 205.545
- Environ 69% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.075 versus 0.635
- Environ 91% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.902 versus 10.932
- 3.1x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2483 versus 800
- Environ 86% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3406 versus 1833
- Environ 67% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4045 versus 2418
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 8 November 2013 versus 22 March 2012 |
| Pipelines | 384 versus 144 |
| Performance á point flottant | 711.2 gflops versus 253.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5016 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.451 versus 5.332 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 370.814 versus 205.545 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.075 versus 0.635 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.902 versus 10.932 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2483 versus 800 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3406 versus 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4045 versus 2418 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
- Environ 43% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.728 versus 22.557
- 19x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 800 versus 42
- 33.3x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 1833 versus 55
- 33.5x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 2418 versus 72.2
| Caractéristiques | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Référence | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.728 versus 22.557 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 800 versus 42 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 1833 versus 55 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 2418 versus 72.2 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M |
|---|---|---|
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 10.451 | 5.332 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 370.814 | 205.545 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.075 | 0.635 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 20.902 | 10.932 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 22.557 | 22.728 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2483 | 800 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3406 | 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 4045 | 2418 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 42 | 800 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 55 | 1833 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 72.2 | 2418 |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 559 | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 171 | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 2535 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition | NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GK107 | GF116 |
| Date de sortie | 8 November 2013 | 22 March 2012 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 1459 | 1462 |
| Genre | Desktop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 926 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 711.2 gflops | 253.4 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 144 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 29.63 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 1,170 million |
| Vitesse augmenté | 753 MHz | |
| Noyaux CUDA | Up to 144 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Résolution VGA maximale | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 12 API |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 80.26 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5016 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Blu-Ray | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DirectCompute | ||
| DirectX 11 | DirectX 11 | |
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 635M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAQuadro 410
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 735M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs
IntelHD Graphics 5300
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs
AMDRadeon RX Vega 11 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics 80EU (Alder Lake)
