NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition and NVIDIA Quadro K1100M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• Around 31% higher core clock speed: 926 MHz vs 706 MHz
• Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 29.63 GTexel / s vs 22.59 GTexel / s
• Around 31% better floating-point performance: 711.2 gflops vs 542.2 gflops
• Around 79% higher memory clock speed: 5016 MHz vs 2800 MHz
• Around 21% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 10.451 vs 8.649
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 370.814 vs 174.555
• Around 67% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.075 vs 0.642
• Around 78% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 20.902 vs 11.732
• Around 38% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 22.557 vs 16.3
• Around 31% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 2483 vs 1892
• 4x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3406 vs 861
• 2.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 4045 vs 1443

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

• Around 11% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 50 Watt
• 45x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 1892 vs 42
• 15.7x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 861 vs 55
• 20x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 1443 vs 72.2

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M Mac Edition
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K1100M

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10.451 8.649
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	370.814 174.555
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.075 0.642
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	20.902 11.732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	22.557 16.3
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	2483 1892
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3406 861
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4045 1443
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	42 1892
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	55 861
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	72.2 1443

Compare specifications (specs)