NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M vs AMD FirePro M5950

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M and AMD FirePro M5950 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 35% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 725 MHz
• Around 80% higher texture fill rate: 31.36 GTexel / s vs 17.4 GTexel / s
• Around 8% better floating-point performance: 752.6 gflops vs 696.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 3600 MHz
• Around 29% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1695 vs 1314
• 4.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 4933 vs 1135
• 10.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.449 vs 1.199
• Around 41% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 455.796 vs 323.699
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.295 vs 0.535
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.566 vs 16.137
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3093 vs 1528
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3504 vs 2590
• 2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3093 vs 1528
• Around 35% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3504 vs 2590

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro M5950

• Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
• Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 77% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 574 vs 325
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 66.638 vs 28.025

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M5950

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1695 1314
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	325 574
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4933 1135
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.449 1.199
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	455.796 323.699
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.295 0.535
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.566 16.137
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.025 66.638
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3093 1528
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3504 2590
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3354
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3093 1528
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3504 2590
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3354

Compare specifications (specs)