NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M versus AMD FirePro M5950
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M and AMD FirePro M5950 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 2 ans 5 mois plus tard
- Environ 35% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 980 MHz versus 725 MHz
- Environ 80% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 31.36 GTexel / s versus 17.4 GTexel / s
- Environ 8% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 752.6 gflops versus 696.0 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 28 nm versus 40 nm
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 2 GB versus 1 GB
- Environ 50% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 5400 MHz versus 3600 MHz
- Environ 30% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 1706 versus 1314
- 3.8x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 4922 versus 1279
- 10.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.449 versus 1.199
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 455.796 versus 323.699
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.295 versus 0.535
- Environ 52% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.566 versus 16.137
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 3093 versus 1528
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3504 versus 2590
- 2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 3093 versus 1528
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3504 versus 2590
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 25 June 2013 versus 4 January 2011 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz versus 725 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31.36 GTexel / s versus 17.4 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 752.6 gflops versus 696.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm versus 40 nm |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 2 GB versus 1 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5400 MHz versus 3600 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1706 versus 1314 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4922 versus 1279 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.449 versus 1.199 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 455.796 versus 323.699 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.295 versus 0.535 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.566 versus 16.137 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3093 versus 1528 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3504 versus 2590 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3093 versus 1528 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3504 versus 2590 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD FirePro M5950
- Environ 25% de pipelines plus haut: 480 versus 384
- Environ 43% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 35 Watt versus 50 Watt
- Environ 76% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 574 versus 326
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 66.638 versus 28.025
| Caractéristiques | |
| Pipelines | 480 versus 384 |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 35 Watt versus 50 Watt |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 574 versus 326 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 66.638 versus 28.025 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3354 versus 3344 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3354 versus 3344 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
GPU 2: AMD FirePro M5950
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | AMD FirePro M5950 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1706 | 1314 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 326 | 574 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4922 | 1279 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.449 | 1.199 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 455.796 | 323.699 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.295 | 0.535 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.566 | 16.137 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.025 | 66.638 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3093 | 1528 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3504 | 2590 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 3354 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3093 | 1528 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3504 | 2590 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 3354 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2148 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | AMD FirePro M5950 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale 2 |
| Nom de code | GK107 | Whistler |
| Date de sortie | 25 June 2013 | 4 January 2011 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 962 | 991 |
| Genre | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse du noyau | 980 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 752.6 gflops | 696.0 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 480 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 31.36 GTexel / s | 17.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 35 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 1,270 million | 716 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Audio HD reseau 7.1 sur HDMI | ||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Soutien du signal sDP 1.2 | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| Protection du contenu HDCP | ||
| HDMI | ||
| Support du signale LVDS | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| Bitstreaming d’audio TrueHD et DTS-HD | ||
| Soutien de l’écran analog VGA | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Soutien de bus | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | n / a |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | medium sized |
| Facteur de forme | MXM-A | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 11.2 (11_0) |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 86.4 GB / s | 57 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 5400 MHz | 3600 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
| Configuration standard de la mémoire | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 3000
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
NVIDIAGeForce Go 6100 + nForce Go 430
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
AMDRadeon HD 8410G IGP
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
NVIDIAGeForce 800A
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
NVIDIAQuadro K620
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
IntelIris Graphics 550
