NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M vs NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 460

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M and NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 460 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 11 year(s) 4 month(s) later
• 3.3x more core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 300 MHz
• 26.1x more texture fill rate: 31.36 GTexel / s vs 1.2 GTexel / s
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 150 nm
• 32x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 64 MB
• 12x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 450 MHz
• 422.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1691 vs 4
• Around 84% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 324 vs 176

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce4 MX 460

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1691 4
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	324 176

Compare specifications (specs)