NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M and NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 5 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- Around 96% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 7.8x more texture fill rate: 31.36 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s
- 24x more pipelines: 384 vs 16
- 18.8x better floating-point performance: 752.6 gflops vs 40 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 65 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 13.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1688 vs 122
- Around 90% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 326 vs 172
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 June 2013 vs 3 June 2008 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 500 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 31.36 GTexel / s vs 4 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 384 vs 16 |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops vs 40 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 65 nm |
Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1688 vs 122 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 326 vs 172 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G
- 2.5x lower typical power consumption: 20 Watt vs 50 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 20 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 1688 | 122 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 326 | 172 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 4930 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.449 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 455.796 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.295 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.566 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.025 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3093 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3504 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3093 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3504 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2148 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | NVIDIA GeForce 9500M G | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla |
Code name | GK107 | G96 |
Launch date | 25 June 2013 | 3 June 2008 |
Place in performance rating | 985 | 982 |
Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 500 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | 40 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 65 nm |
Pipelines | 384 | 16 |
Texture fill rate | 31.36 GTexel / s | 4 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 20 Watt |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 314 million |
CUDA cores | 16 | |
Gigaflops | 60 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | ||
HDMI | ||
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Laptop size | medium sized | medium sized |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12 API | 10.0 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | 25.6 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 1600 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR2, GDDR3 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
CUDA | ||
Direct Compute | ||
FXAA | ||
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
Optimus | ||
PCI-E 2.0 |