NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M vs AMD Radeon HD 6770M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M and AMD Radeon HD 6770M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 5 month(s) later
• Around 35% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 725 MHz
• Around 80% higher texture fill rate: 31.36 GTexel / s vs 17.4 GTexel / s
• Around 8% better floating-point performance: 752.6 gflops vs 696.0 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 40 nm
• 2x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 1 GB
• Around 50% higher memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 3600 MHz
• Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1688 vs 964
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 12.449 vs 4.817
• Around 94% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 455.796 vs 234.842
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 1.295 vs 0.393
• Around 59% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.566 vs 15.475
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3504 vs 3044
• Around 15% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3504 vs 3044

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 6770M

• Around 25% higher pipelines: 480 vs 384
• Around 43% lower typical power consumption: 35 Watt vs 50 Watt
• Around 75% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 572 vs 326
• Around 69% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 8338 vs 4933
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 33.71 vs 28.025

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 6770M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	1688 964
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	326 572
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	4933 8338
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12.449 4.817
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	455.796 234.842
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1.295 0.393
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.566 15.475
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	28.025 33.71
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3504 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3504 3044
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3344 3348

Compare specifications (specs)