NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 36% higher core clock speed: 980 MHz vs 720 MHz
- 5.4x more texture fill rate: 31.36 GTexel / s vs 5.76 GTexel / s
- 4.8x more pipelines: 384 vs 80
- 6.5x better floating-point performance: 752.6 gflops vs 115.2 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 2 GB vs 512 MB
- 3.4x more memory clock speed: 5400 MHz vs 1600 MHz
- 8.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1691 vs 200
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 324 vs 270
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3344 vs 1844
- Around 81% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3344 vs 1844
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 25 June 2013 vs 5 May 2010 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz vs 720 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 31.36 GTexel / s vs 5.76 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 384 vs 80 |
| Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops vs 115.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 2 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz vs 1600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1691 vs 200 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 324 vs 270 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 vs 1844 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 vs 1844 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v
- 3.3x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 50 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 50 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1691 | 200 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 324 | 270 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4944 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 12.449 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 455.796 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 1.295 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.566 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 28.025 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 3093 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3504 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3344 | 1844 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 3093 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3504 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3344 | 1844 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2148 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 545v | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
| Code name | GK107 | M92 |
| Launch date | 25 June 2013 | 5 May 2010 |
| Place in performance rating | 988 | 990 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 720 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | 115.2 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 384 | 80 |
| Texture fill rate | 31.36 GTexel / s | 5.76 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 242 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | ||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | ||
| HDMI | ||
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | ||
| VGA аnalog display support | Up to 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12 API | 10.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB / s | 12.8 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 1600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3, DDR3, DDR2 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | ||
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | ||
| CUDA | ||
| Direct Compute | ||
| FXAA | ||
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | ||
| Optimus | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M with others
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 360M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 545v
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
AMDRadeon HD 6770M
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
AMDRadeon R9 M360
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
AMDRadeon 535 Mobile
NVIDIAGeForce GT 755M vs
IntelArc A350M
