NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 7 month(s) later
  • Around 29% higher core clock speed: 775 MHz vs 600 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 28 nm vs 55 nm
  • 7.2x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 108 Watt
  • Around 13% higher memory clock speed: 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
  • 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 144 vs 49
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3327 vs 3258
  • Around 2% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3327 vs 3258
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 27 November 2013 vs 30 March 2009
Core clock speed 775 MHz vs 600 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm vs 55 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt vs 108 Watt
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz vs 1600 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 144 vs 49
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3327 vs 3258
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3327 vs 3258

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

  • 3.1x more texture fill rate: 38.4 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
  • Around 55% better floating-point performance: 462.3 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
  • Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 825 vs 551
  • 5.3x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 13337 vs 2530
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 38.4 GTexel / s vs 12.4 GTexel / s
Pipelines 192 vs 96
Floating-point performance 462.3 gflops vs 297.6 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 825 vs 551
Geekbench - OpenCL 13337 vs 2530

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
551
825
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
144
49
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
2530
13337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3327
3258
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3327
3258
Name NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800
PassMark - G3D Mark 551 825
PassMark - G2D Mark 144 49
Geekbench - OpenCL 2530 13337
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 2.692
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 161.29
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 0.55
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 11.858
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 17.753
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 2479
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3327 3258
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 1263
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 2479
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3327 3258

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800

Essentials

Architecture Fermi 2.0 Tesla 2.0
Code name GF117 GT200B
Launch date 27 November 2013 30 March 2009
Place in performance rating 1366 1363
Type Desktop Workstation
Launch price (MSRP) $799
Price now $109.99
Value for money (0-100) 9.89

Technical info

Core clock speed 775 MHz 600 MHz
Floating-point performance 297.6 gflops 462.3 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 28 nm 55 nm
Pipelines 96 192
Texture fill rate 12.4 GTexel / s 38.4 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 15 Watt 108 Watt
Transistor count 585 million 1,400 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 198 mm
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (11_0) 10.0
OpenGL 4.6 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 14.4 GB / s 51.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 64 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1800 MHz 1600 MHz
Memory type DDR3 GDDR3