NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 and NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 1 year(s) 0 month(s) later
  • Around 13% higher core clock speed: 1836 MHz vs 1625 MHz
  • 2.3x more texture fill rate: 47.2 billion / sec vs 20.8 billion / sec
  • 2x more pipelines: 128 vs 64
  • Around 86% better floating-point performance: 387.1 gflops vs 208 gflops
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 55 nm vs 65 nm
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 512 MB
  • Around 22% higher memory clock speed: 1100 MHz vs 900 MHz
  • Around 24% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 591 vs 477
  • Around 23% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 54 vs 44
  • 24.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3108 vs 127
  • 24.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3108 vs 127
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3351 vs 3161
  • Around 6% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3351 vs 3161
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 4 March 2009 vs 21 February 2008
Core clock speed 1836 MHz vs 1625 MHz
Texture fill rate 47.2 billion / sec vs 20.8 billion / sec
Pipelines 128 vs 64
Floating-point performance 387.1 gflops vs 208 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 55 nm vs 65 nm
Maximum memory size 1 GB vs 512 MB
Memory clock speed 1100 MHz vs 900 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 591 vs 477
PassMark - G2D Mark 54 vs 44
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3108 vs 127
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3108 vs 127
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 vs 3161
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 vs 3161

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT

  • Around 56% lower typical power consumption: 96 Watt vs 150 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 96 Watt vs 150 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
591
477
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
54
44
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3108
127
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3108
127
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
3161
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3351
3161
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark 591 477
PassMark - G2D Mark 54 44
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3108 127
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3108 127
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3351 3161
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3351 3161
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 0.465

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 NVIDIA GeForce 9600 GT

Essentials

Architecture Tesla Tesla
Code name G92B G94
Launch date 4 March 2009 21 February 2008
Launch price (MSRP) $199 $179
Place in performance rating 1021 1587
Price now $114.99 $39.99
Type Desktop Desktop
Value for money (0-100) 9.91 23.72

Technical info

Core clock speed 1836 MHz 1625 MHz
CUDA cores 128 64
Floating-point performance 387.1 gflops 208 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 55 nm 65 nm
Maximum GPU temperature 105 °C 105 °C
Pipelines 128 64
Texture fill rate 47.2 billion / sec 20.8 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 150 Watt 96 Watt
Transistor count 754 million 505 million

Video outputs and ports

Audio input for HDMI S / PDIF S / PDIF
Display Connectors 2x DVI, Two Dual Link DVI 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVTwo Dual Link DVI
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Height 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16
Length 9" (228.6 mm) (22.9 cm) 9" (22.9 cm)
SLI options 2-way3-way 2-way
Supplementary power connectors 6-pin 6-pin
Bus support 16x PCI-E 2.0

API support

DirectX 10.0 10.0
OpenGL 3.0 2.1

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 512 MB
Memory bandwidth 70.4 GB / s 57.6 GB / s
Memory bus width 256 Bit 256 Bit
Memory clock speed 1100 MHz 900 MHz
Memory type GDDR3 GDDR3

Technologies

3D Vision
CUDA
SLI