NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M

  • Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 13.46 GTexel / s
  • Around 33% higher pipelines: 96 vs 72
  • Around 63% better floating-point performance: 264 gflops vs 162 gflops
  • Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 38 Watt vs 45 Watt
Texture fill rate 17.6 GTexel / s vs 13.46 GTexel / s
Pipelines 96 vs 72
Floating-point performance 264 gflops vs 162 gflops
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 38 Watt vs 45 Watt

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

  • Around 2% higher core clock speed: 561 MHz vs 550 MHz
Core clock speed 561 MHz vs 550 MHz

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

Name NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
PassMark - G3D Mark 467
PassMark - G2D Mark 70
Geekbench - OpenCL 7043
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 1450
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 1450
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 926
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 926

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M

Essentials

Architecture Tesla 2.0 Tesla 2.0
Code name GT215 GT215
Launch date 15 June 2009 15 June 2009
Place in performance rating not rated 1511
Type Laptop Mobile workstation

Technical info

Core clock speed 550 MHz 561 MHz
CUDA cores 96
Floating-point performance 264 gflops 162 gflops
Gigaflops 396
Manufacturing process technology 40 nm 40 nm
Pipelines 96 72
Texture fill rate 17.6 GTexel / s 13.46 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 38 Watt 45 Watt
Transistor count 727 million 727 million

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors HDMIVGADual Link DVIDisplayPortSingle Link DVILVDS No outputs
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Bus support PCI-E 2.0
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 MXM-A (3.0)
Laptop size large medium sized
MXM Type MXM 3.0 Type-B
SLI options 2-way

API support

DirectX 10.1 10.1
OpenGL 2.1 3.3

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 1 GB
Memory bandwidth 57.6 GB / s 35.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 128 Bit
Memory type GDDR3, GDDR5 DDR3, GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0
Memory clock speed 2200 MHz

Technologies

CUDA
HybridPower
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management 8.0
PowerMizer 8.0
SLI

Navigation

Choose a GPU

Compare videocards

Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M with others

NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M NVIDIA
GeForce GTS 260M
vs ATI Radeon E4690 ATI
Radeon E4690
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M NVIDIA
GeForce GTS 260M
vs ATI Radeon HD 4730 ATI
Radeon HD 4730
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M NVIDIA
GeForce GTS 260M
vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M NVIDIA
Quadro FX 1800M