NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M
- Around 31% higher texture fill rate: 17.6 GTexel / s vs 13.46 GTexel / s
- Around 33% higher pipelines: 96 vs 72
- Around 63% better floating-point performance: 264 gflops vs 162 gflops
- Around 18% lower typical power consumption: 38 Watt vs 45 Watt
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s vs 13.46 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 96 vs 72 |
Floating-point performance | 264 gflops vs 162 gflops |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 38 Watt vs 45 Watt |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
- Around 2% higher core clock speed: 561 MHz vs 550 MHz
Core clock speed | 561 MHz vs 550 MHz |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 467 | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 70 | |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 7043 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 1450 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 1450 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 926 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 926 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 260M | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1800M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | GT215 | GT215 |
Launch date | 15 June 2009 | 15 June 2009 |
Place in performance rating | not rated | 1510 |
Type | Laptop | Mobile workstation |
Technical info |
||
Core clock speed | 550 MHz | 561 MHz |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Floating-point performance | 264 gflops | 162 gflops |
Gigaflops | 396 | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Pipelines | 96 | 72 |
Texture fill rate | 17.6 GTexel / s | 13.46 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 38 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 727 million | 727 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | HDMIVGADual Link DVIDisplayPortSingle Link DVILVDS | No outputs |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Laptop size | large | medium sized |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 10.1 | 10.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB / s | 35.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory type | GDDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Memory clock speed | 2200 MHz | |
Technologies |
||
CUDA | ||
HybridPower | ||
MXM 3.0 Type-B | ||
Power management | 8.0 | |
PowerMizer 8.0 | ||
SLI |