NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 3.1x more core clock speed: 1566 MHz vs 513 MHz
- 2x more texture fill rate: 25.1 billion / sec vs 12.31 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 192 vs 96
- 2.6x better floating-point performance: 601.3 gflops vs 228.1 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 40 nm vs 90 nm
- Around 35% lower typical power consumption: 106 Watt vs 143 Watt
- 3.2x more maximum memory size: 1 GB vs 320 MB
- Around 14% higher memory clock speed: 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 1584 MHz
- 3.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 1322 vs 412
- 10x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 310 vs 31
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 13 September 2010 vs 12 February 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 1566 MHz vs 513 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 25.1 billion / sec vs 12.31 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 192 vs 96 |
| Floating-point performance | 601.3 gflops vs 228.1 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm vs 90 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 106 Watt vs 143 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 1 GB vs 320 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz vs 1584 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1322 vs 412 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 310 vs 31 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 1322 | 412 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 310 | 31 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 4907 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 14.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 302.509 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 0.965 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 14.925 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 27.656 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 2160 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3365 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3325 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 2160 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3365 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3325 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 0 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Fermi | Tesla |
| Code name | GF106 | G80 |
| Launch date | 13 September 2010 | 12 February 2007 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $129 | $269 |
| Place in performance rating | 1130 | 1640 |
| Price now | $64.99 | |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
| Value for money (0-100) | 26.46 | |
Technical info |
||
| Core clock speed | 1566 MHz | 513 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 192 | |
| Floating-point performance | 601.3 gflops | 228.1 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 90 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 100 °C | |
| Pipelines | 192 | 96 |
| Texture fill rate | 25.1 billion / sec | 12.31 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 106 Watt | 143 Watt |
| Transistor count | 1,170 million | 681 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
| Display Connectors | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI, Mini HDMITwo Dual Link DVI | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| HDMI | ||
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 x 16 | |
| Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | 267 mm |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (11_0) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.2 | 3.3 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 320 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.7 GB / s | 63.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 320 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1804 (3608 data rate) MHz | 1584 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| DSR | ||
| SLI | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450 vs
ATIRadeon 9600
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450 vs
NVIDIAGeForce FX 5500
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450 vs
NVIDIATesla C1060
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450 vs
AMDRadeon E6760
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450 vs
AMDRadeon HD 7750
NVIDIAGeForce GTS 450 vs
AMDRadeon R5 230 OEM
