NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) and NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 6 month(s) later
- 3.4x more core clock speed: 1290 MHz vs 375 MHz
- 3.7x more boost clock speed: 1392 MHz vs 375 MHz
- 6.5x more texture fill rate: 58.2 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s
- 32x more pipelines: 640 vs 20
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 90 nm
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 7x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 29.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5027 vs 171
- Around 66% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 457 vs 275
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 25 October 2016 vs 18 April 2006 |
Core clock speed | 1290 MHz vs 375 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz vs 375 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 58.2 GTexel / s vs 9 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 640 vs 20 |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm vs 90 nm |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5027 vs 171 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 457 vs 275 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
- Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5027 | 171 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 457 | 275 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17476 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7043 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3685 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7043 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3685 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 122 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | NVIDIA Quadro FX 1500M | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Curie |
Code name | GP107 | G71 |
Launch date | 25 October 2016 | 18 April 2006 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $109 | |
Place in performance rating | 600 | 598 |
Price now | $124.99 | |
Type | Desktop | Mobile workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1392 MHz | 375 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1290 MHz | 375 MHz |
CUDA cores | 640 | |
Floating-point performance | 1,862 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 90 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 97 °C | |
Pipelines | 640 | 20 |
Texture fill rate | 58.2 GTexel / s | 9 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 45 Watt |
Transistor count | 3,300 million | 278 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
Height | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Length | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Recommended system power (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Width | 2-slot | |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 112 GB / s | 32.0 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 500 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | 256 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
VR Ready |