NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs AMD Radeon HD 8530M
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) and AMD Radeon HD 8530M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 2.1x more core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 650 MHz
- 2.1x more boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 700 MHz
- 3.6x more texture fill rate: 59.72 GTexel / s vs 16.8 GTexel / s
- Around 67% higher pipelines: 640 vs 384
- 3.6x better floating-point performance: 1,911 gflops vs 537.6 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 3.9x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
- 9.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4463 vs 490
- Around 52% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3721 vs 2455
- 94x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3721 vs 39.6
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 February 2017 vs 10 January 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 650 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 700 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 59.72 GTexel / s vs 16.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 384 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,911 gflops vs 537.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1800 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4463 vs 490 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 vs 2455 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 vs 39.6 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon HD 8530M
- Around 50% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 438 vs 292
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 438 vs 292 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon HD 8530M
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | AMD Radeon HD 8530M |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4463 | 490 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 292 | 438 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17466 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7239 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 | 2455 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7239 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 | 39.6 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2084 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | AMD Radeon HD 8530M | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GP106B | Mars |
| Launch date | 1 February 2017 | 10 January 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 595 | 598 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | 700 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 650 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,911 gflops | 537.6 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 384 |
| Texture fill rate | 59.72 GTexel / s | 16.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 1,040 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 555 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon HD 7550M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon HD 8530M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
NVIDIANVS 810
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 4100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
IntelIris Xe Graphics G4
