NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) and AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 month(s) later
• Around 20% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 1125 MHz
• Around 24% higher boost clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1201 MHz
• Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 6000 MHz
• Around 21% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4463 vs 3676
• Around 22% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 67.209 vs 55.077
• Around 10% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 4.536 vs 4.132
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 7239 vs 5431
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3721 vs 1123
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2678
• Around 33% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 7239 vs 5431
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3721 vs 1123
• Around 25% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2678

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

• Around 29% higher texture fill rate: 76.86 GTexel / s vs 59.72 GTexel / s
• Around 60% higher pipelines: 1024 vs 640
• Around 29% better floating-point performance: 2,460 gflops vs 1,911 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 634 vs 292
• Around 1% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 17696 vs 17466
• Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 830.773 vs 799.414
• 2.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.584 vs 30.523
• Around 1% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 225.985 vs 223.683

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	4463 3676
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	292 634
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	17466 17696
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	67.209 55.077
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	799.414 830.773
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4.536 4.132
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	30.523 82.584
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	223.683 225.985
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7239 5431
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3721 1123
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 2678
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	7239 5431
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3721 1123
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 2678

Compare specifications (specs)