NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) and ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 69% higher core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 800 MHz
- 9.3x more texture fill rate: 59.72 GTexel / s vs 6.4 GTexel / s
- 5.3x more pipelines: 640 vs 120
- 10x better floating-point performance: 1,911 gflops vs 192 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 65 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 256 MB
- 3.2x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 2200 MHz
- 15.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4462 vs 283
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3721 vs 3695
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 1701
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3721 vs 3695
- Around 97% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 1701
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 February 2017 vs 28 June 2007 |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 800 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 59.72 GTexel / s vs 6.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 640 vs 120 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,911 gflops vs 192 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 65 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 256 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 2200 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4462 vs 283 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 vs 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 1701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 vs 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 1701 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
- Around 50% lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 75 Watt
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 371 vs 292
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 50 Watt vs 75 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 371 vs 292 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
GPU 2: ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 4462 | 283 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 292 | 371 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 17464 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7239 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 1701 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7239 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 | 3695 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 1701 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2085 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale |
| Code name | GP106B | RV630 |
| Launch date | 1 February 2017 | 28 June 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 645 | 643 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $199 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 800 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 1,911 gflops | 192 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 640 | 120 |
| Texture fill rate | 59.72 GTexel / s | 6.4 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 390 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 256 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 35.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 2200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR4 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
ATIMobility Radeon X2300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
ATIRadeon HD 2600 XT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3430
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
AMDFirePro M5100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
AMDFirePro W5100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon R7 360
