NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) and NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 13 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- 3.2x more core clock speed: 1354 MHz vs 425 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 90 nm
- 185.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 4462 vs 24
- Around 10% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 292 vs 265
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2017 vs 22 December 2003 |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz vs 425 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 90 nm |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4462 vs 24 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 292 vs 265 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S
- 6.8x lower typical power consumption: 11 Watt vs 75 Watt
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 11 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 4462 | 24 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 292 | 265 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 17470 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 67.209 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 799.414 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 4.536 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 | |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 223.683 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 7239 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3721 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 7239 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3721 | |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2085 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Notebook) | NVIDIA Quadro NVS 210S | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Curie |
Code name | GP106B | MCP51 |
Launch date | 1 February 2017 | 22 December 2003 |
Place in performance rating | 643 | 640 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1493 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1354 MHz | 425 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 1,911 gflops | |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 90 nm |
Pipelines | 640 | |
Texture fill rate | 59.72 GTexel / s | |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 11 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 75 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCI |
Laptop size | large | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 9.0c |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection |