NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop) and NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)

Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 3 month(s) later
Around 99% higher texture fill rate: 66.82 GTexel / s vs 33.6 billion / sec
6.9x more pipelines: 768 vs 112
6.4x better floating-point performance: 2,138 gflops vs 336.0 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 65 nm
Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 105 Watt
8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
13.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 6332 vs 454
11.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 650 vs 56
Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 2845
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 3304
Around 30% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 2845
Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 3304

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	25 October 2016 vs 21 July 2008
Texture fill rate	66.82 GTexel / s vs 33.6 billion / sec
Pipelines	768 vs 112
Floating-point performance	2,138 gflops vs 336.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm vs 65 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 105 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 512 MB
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	6332 vs 454
PassMark - G2D Mark	650 vs 56
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3687 vs 2845
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3336 vs 3304
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3687 vs 2845
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3336 vs 3304

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

Around 8% higher core clock speed: 1500 MHz vs 1392 MHz
128.6x more memory clock speed: 900 MHz vs 7 GB/s

Core clock speed	1500 MHz vs 1392 MHz
Memory clock speed	900 MHz vs 7 GB/s

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

6332

454

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

650

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3687

2845

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3336

3304

GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3687

2845

GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)

GPU 1

GPU 2

3336

3304

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)	NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
PassMark - G3D Mark	6332	454
PassMark - G2D Mark	650	56
Geekbench - OpenCL	20732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.071
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	24.676
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3687	2845
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3336	3304
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3687	2845
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3336	3304
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	305

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Desktop)	NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	Tesla
Code name	GP107	G92
Launch date	25 October 2016	21 July 2008
Launch price (MSRP)	$139	$160
Place in performance rating	487	1063
Price now	$159.99	$103.99
Type	Desktop	Desktop
Value for money (0-100)	46.07	8.86
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1392 MHz
Core clock speed	1392 MHz	1500 MHz
CUDA cores	768	112
Floating-point performance	2,138 gflops	336.0 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	65 nm
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	105 °C
Pipelines	768	112
Texture fill rate	66.82 GTexel / s	33.6 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	105 Watt
Transistor count	3,300 million	754 million
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	2x DVI, 1x S-Video, HDTVDual Link DVI
G-SYNC support
Audio input for HDMI		S / PDIF
Maximum VGA resolution		2048x1536
Multi monitor support
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Length	145 mm	9" (22.9 cm)
Supplementary power connectors	None	2x 6-pin
SLI options		2-way
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	10.0
OpenGL	4.6	2.1
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	512 MB
Memory bandwidth	112 GB / s	57.6 GB / s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	7 GB/s	900 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR3
Shared memory	0
Technologies
3D Vision
Ansel
CUDA
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
VR Ready
SLI