NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Intel HD Graphics 6000
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and Intel HD Graphics 6000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 3.8x more core clock speed: 1152 MHz vs 300 MHz
- Around 42% higher boost clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 1000 MHz
- 16x more pipelines: 768 vs 48
- 6.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5320 vs 875
- Around 26% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 345 vs 273
- 5.7x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19914 vs 3519
- 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8059 vs 1225
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3579 vs 1363
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 vs 3259
- 6.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8059 vs 1225
- 2.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3579 vs 1363
- Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 vs 3259
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 3 January 2018 vs 5 September 2014 |
| Core clock speed | 1152 MHz vs 300 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1417 MHz vs 1000 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 48 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5320 vs 875 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 345 vs 273 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19914 vs 3519 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8059 vs 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3579 vs 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8059 vs 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3579 vs 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3259 |
Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 6000
- 5x lower typical power consumption: 15 Watt vs 75 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt vs 75 Watt |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | Intel HD Graphics 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5320 | 875 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 345 | 273 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19914 | 3519 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.188 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1159.046 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.507 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.067 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 293.638 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8059 | 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3579 | 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8059 | 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3579 | 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3259 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2219 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | Intel HD Graphics 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Generation 8.0 |
| Code name | GP107 | Broadwell GT3 |
| Launch date | 3 January 2018 | 5 September 2014 |
| Place in performance rating | 505 | 1126 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1417 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1152 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,177 gflops | |
| Manufacturing process technology | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 48 |
| Texture fill rate | 68.02 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Transistor count | 3,300 million | 189 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | |
| Shared memory | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3670
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9650M GS
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon HD 7950
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDFirePro W7000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Sky 500
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGRID M60-1Q
