NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q versus Intel HD Graphics 6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and Intel HD Graphics 6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 3 mois plus tard
- 3.8x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1152 MHz versus 300 MHz
- Environ 42% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1417 MHz versus 1000 MHz
- 16x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 48
- 6.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5320 versus 875
- Environ 26% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 345 versus 273
- 5.7x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 19914 versus 3519
- 6.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8059 versus 1225
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3579 versus 1363
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3358 versus 3259
- 6.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8059 versus 1225
- 2.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3579 versus 1363
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3358 versus 3259
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 3 January 2018 versus 5 September 2014 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1152 MHz versus 300 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1417 MHz versus 1000 MHz |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 48 |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5320 versus 875 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 345 versus 273 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19914 versus 3519 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8059 versus 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3579 versus 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 versus 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8059 versus 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3579 versus 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 versus 3259 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 6000
- 5x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 15 Watt versus 75 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 15 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | Intel HD Graphics 6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5320 | 875 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 345 | 273 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 19914 | 3519 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 54.188 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1159.046 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.507 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 82.067 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 293.638 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8059 | 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3579 | 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3259 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8059 | 1225 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3579 | 1363 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3259 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2219 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | Intel HD Graphics 6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Generation 8.0 |
| Nom de code | GP107 | Broadwell GT3 |
| Date de sortie | 3 January 2018 | 5 September 2014 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 505 | 1126 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1417 MHz | 1000 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1152 MHz | 300 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,177 gflops | |
| Processus de fabrication | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 48 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 68.02 GTexel / s | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 3,300 million | 189 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x1 |
| Taille du laptop | medium sized | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.1 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
ATIMobility Radeon HD 3670
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGeForce 9650M GS
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon HD 7950
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDFirePro W7000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon Sky 500
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs
NVIDIAGRID M60-1Q
