NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 year(s) 10 month(s) later
• 2x more core clock speed: 1152 MHz vs 575 MHz
• 2.5x more boost clock speed: 1417 MHz vs 575 MHz
• 4.9x more texture fill rate: 68.02 GTexel / s vs 13.8 GTexel / s
• 32x more pipelines: 768 vs 24
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 90 nm
• 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
• 5.8x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1200 MHz
• 17.5x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5355 vs 306
• Around 38% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 425 vs 309

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro FX 3500M

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5355 306
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	425 309

Compare specifications (specs)