NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro P1000 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q

• Videocard is newer: launch date 10 month(s) later
• Around 15% higher texture fill rate: 68.02 GTexel / s vs 59.2 GTexel / s
• Around 50% higher pipelines: 768 vs 512
• Around 15% better floating-point performance: 2,177 gflops vs 1,894 gflops
• Around 40% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 5012 MHz
• Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5339 vs 4464
• Around 27% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 19845 vs 15667
• Around 39% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1159.046 vs 832.248
• Around 36% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.507 vs 4.039
• Around 26% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 82.067 vs 65.117
• Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 293.638 vs 245.081
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8059 vs 6796
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8059 vs 6796
• Around 39% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2219 vs 1591

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P1000

• Around 10% higher core clock speed: 1266 MHz vs 1152 MHz
• Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1480 MHz vs 1417 MHz
• Around 60% lower typical power consumption: 47 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 71% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 595 vs 348
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 71.86 vs 54.188
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3702 vs 3579
• Around 3% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3702 vs 3579

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro P1000

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5339 4464
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	348 595
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	19845 15667
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	54.188 71.86
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1159.046 832.248
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.507 4.039
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	82.067 65.117
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	293.638 245.081
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8059 6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3579 3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3348
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8059 6796
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3579 3702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3358 3348
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2219 1591

Compare specifications (specs)