NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs AMD Radeon R5 M430

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and AMD Radeon R5 M430 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 45% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1030 MHz
• Around 89% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 855 MHz
• 3.8x more texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 20.6 GTexel / s
• 2.4x more pipelines: 768 vs 320
• 3.8x better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 659.2 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.9x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1800 MHz
• 9.1x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5918 vs 649
• 4.1x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 vs 5084
• 5.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 13.812
• 5.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 vs 144.604
• 5.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 0.981
• Around 33% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.676 vs 18.55
• 4.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 65.872
• 7.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 1087
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 1157
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 2212
• 7.8x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 1087
• 3.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 1157
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 2212

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R5 M430

• Around 60% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 516 vs 323

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M430

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5918 649
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	323 516
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	20732 5084
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.758 13.812
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	843.503 144.604
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.071 0.981
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.676 18.55
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	301.168 65.872
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 1157
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 2212
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 1087
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 1157
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 2212

Compare specifications (specs)