NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) versus AMD Radeon R5 M430
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and AMD Radeon R5 M430 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 8 mois plus tard
- Environ 45% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1493 MHz versus 1030 MHz
- Environ 89% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1620 MHz versus 855 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 77.76 GTexel / s versus 20.6 GTexel / s
- 2.4x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 320
- 3.8x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,488 gflops versus 659.2 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 3.9x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 1800 MHz
- 9.1x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5918 versus 649
- 4.1x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 versus 5084
- 5.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 versus 13.812
- 5.8x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 versus 144.604
- 5.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 versus 0.981
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.676 versus 18.55
- 4.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 versus 65.872
- 7.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 versus 1087
- 3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 versus 1157
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 versus 2212
- 7.8x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 versus 1087
- 3.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 versus 1157
- Environ 51% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 versus 2212
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 versus 15 May 2016 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz versus 1030 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz versus 855 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.76 GTexel / s versus 20.6 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 320 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,488 gflops versus 659.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 1800 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5918 versus 649 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 versus 5084 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 versus 13.812 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 versus 144.604 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 versus 0.981 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 versus 18.55 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 versus 65.872 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 versus 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 versus 1157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 versus 2212 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 versus 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 versus 1157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 versus 2212 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R5 M430
- Environ 60% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 516 versus 323
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 516 versus 323 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R5 M430
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | AMD Radeon R5 M430 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5918 | 649 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 516 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 | 5084 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | 13.812 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | 144.604 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | 0.981 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | 18.55 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | 65.872 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | 1157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 2212 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 1087 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 1157 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 2212 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | AMD Radeon R5 M430 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Nom de code | GP106B | Exo |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 | 15 May 2016 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 533 | 1182 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz | 855 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz | 1030 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,488 gflops | 659.2 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 320 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.76 GTexel / s | 20.6 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 1,040 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.1 GB / s | 14.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | 1800 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| DirectCompute 5.0 | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
ATIRadeon X850 XT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
ATIFireGL V7300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
ATIFireGL V3300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000
