NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs AMD Radeon R7 260

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and AMD Radeon R7 260 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

AMD Radeon R7 260

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 1 month(s) later
Around 47% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Around 62% higher texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s
Around 62% better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 1,536 gflops
A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
Around 53% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 115 Watt
2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
4.3x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1625 MHz
2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5919 vs 2892
2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 26.189
Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 vs 798.239
Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 4.223
Around 25% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 240.395

Specifications (specs)
Launch date	1 February 2017 vs 17 December 2013
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz vs 1100 MHz
Texture fill rate	77.76 GTexel / s vs 48 GTexel / s
Floating-point performance	2,488 gflops vs 1,536 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt vs 115 Watt
Maximum memory size	4 GB vs 2 GB
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz vs 1625 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark	5919 vs 2892
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	75.758 vs 26.189
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	843.503 vs 798.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.071 vs 4.223
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	301.168 vs 240.395

Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R7 260

Around 73% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 559 vs 323
Around 84% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.294 vs 24.676

Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark	559 vs 323
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	45.294 vs 24.676

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 260

PassMark - G3D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

5919

2892

PassMark - G2D Mark

GPU 1

GPU 2

323

559

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

75.758

26.189

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

843.503

798.239

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

5.071

4.223

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

24.676

45.294

CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)

GPU 1

GPU 2

301.168

240.395

Name	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)	AMD Radeon R7 260
PassMark - G3D Mark	5919	2892
PassMark - G2D Mark	323	559
Geekbench - OpenCL	20725
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	75.758	26.189
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	843.503	798.239
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	5.071	4.223
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	24.676	45.294
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	301.168	240.395
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	3336
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	2340

Compare specifications (specs)

	NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)	AMD Radeon R7 260
Essentials
Architecture	Pascal	GCN 2.0
Code name	GP106B	Bonaire
Launch date	1 February 2017	17 December 2013
Place in performance rating	557	559
Type	Laptop	Desktop
Design		AMD Radeon R7 200 Series
Launch price (MSRP)		$109
Price now		$89.99
Value for money (0-100)		44.11
Technical info
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz	1100 MHz
Core clock speed	1493 MHz
Floating-point performance	2,488 gflops	1,536 gflops
Manufacturing process technology	16 nm	28 nm
Pipelines	768	768
Texture fill rate	77.76 GTexel / s	48 GTexel / s
Thermal Design Power (TDP)	75 Watt	115 Watt
Transistor count	4,400 million	2,080 million
Stream Processors		896
Video outputs and ports
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
G-SYNC support
DisplayPort support
Dual-link DVI support
Eyefinity
HDMI
VGA
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size	large
Bus support		PCIe 3.0
Length		170 mm
Supplementary power connectors		1 x 6-pin
API support
DirectX	12.0 (12_1)	12
OpenGL	4.6	4.5
Vulkan
Memory
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	2 GB
Memory bandwidth	112.1 GB / s	104 GB/s
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7008 MHz	1625 MHz
Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Shared memory	0
Technologies
Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
AMD Eyefinity
DDMA audio
FreeSync