NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 8 year(s) 0 month(s) later
- 3x more core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 500 MHz
- 3.9x more texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s
- 3.1x better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 800.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 55 nm
- 4x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 1 GB
- 4.1x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 1700 MHz
- 6.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5919 vs 866
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 2486
- Around 34% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 2486
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 February 2017 vs 9 January 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 500 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s vs 20 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops vs 800.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 1 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 1700 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 vs 866 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 vs 2486 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 vs 2486 |
Reasons to consider the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850
- Around 4% higher pipelines: 800 vs 768
- Around 46% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 472 vs 323
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Pipelines | 800 vs 768 |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 472 vs 323 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 | 866 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 472 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20122 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 2486 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 2486 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2336 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4850 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale |
| Code name | GP106B | M98 |
| Launch date | 1 February 2017 | 9 January 2009 |
| Place in performance rating | 554 | 549 |
| Type | Laptop | Laptop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1493 MHz | 500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops | 800.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 55 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 800 |
| Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s | 20 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 956 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| G-SYNC support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | large |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 3.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 54.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 1700 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| 1x Dual-Link/Single-Link DVI | ||
| 1x Single-Link DVI Support (all display ports have to be supported by the laptop manufacturer) | ||
| DisplayPort support up to 2560x1600 | ||
| HDMI support up to 1920x1080 (both with 7.1 AC3 Audio) | ||
| PCI-E 2.0 x16 | ||
| Powerplay | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDFirePro W5000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon R7 260
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop)
