NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
- Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1006 MHz
- Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1058 MHz
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 195 Watt
- 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2048 MB
- Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 6008 MHz
- Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5919 vs 5566
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20687 vs 18397
- Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 46.086
- Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 4.645
- 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 99.577
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 7222
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 3666
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 3306
- Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 7222
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 3666
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 3306
- Around 17% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2340 vs 2004
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 1 February 2017 vs 22 March 2012 |
Core clock speed | 1493 MHz vs 1006 MHz |
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz vs 1058 MHz |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 195 Watt |
Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 2048 MB |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 6008 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 vs 5566 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20687 vs 18397 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 vs 46.086 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 vs 4.645 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 vs 99.577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 vs 7222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 vs 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 vs 3306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 vs 7222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 vs 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 vs 3306 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 vs 2004 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
- Around 66% higher texture fill rate: 128.8 billion / sec vs 77.76 GTexel / s
- 2x more pipelines: 1536 vs 768
- Around 24% better floating-point performance: 3,090.4 gflops vs 2,488 gflops
- Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 vs 323
- Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 989.685 vs 843.503
- Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.463 vs 24.676
Specifications (specs) | |
Texture fill rate | 128.8 billion / sec vs 77.76 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 1536 vs 768 |
Floating-point performance | 3,090.4 gflops vs 2,488 gflops |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 530 vs 323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 989.685 vs 843.503 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 36.463 vs 24.676 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 | 5566 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 530 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20687 | 18397 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | 46.086 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | 989.685 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | 4.645 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | 36.463 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | 99.577 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 7222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3306 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 7222 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 3666 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3306 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 | 2004 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
Code name | GP106B | GK104 |
Launch date | 1 February 2017 | 22 March 2012 |
Place in performance rating | 563 | 560 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Launch price (MSRP) | $499 | |
Price now | $579.99 | |
Value for money (0-100) | 12.83 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | 1058 MHz |
Core clock speed | 1493 MHz | 1006 MHz |
Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops | 3,090.4 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 1536 |
Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s | 128.8 billion / sec |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 195 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 3,540 million |
CUDA cores | 1536 | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI... |
G-SYNC support | ||
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
HDCP | ||
HDMI | ||
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (11.1 cm) | |
Length | 10.0" (25.4 cm) | |
SLI options | 3-way | |
Supplementary power connectors | Two 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_0) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.2 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2048 MB |
Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 192.2 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256-bit GDDR5 |
Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 6008 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
3D Vision | ||
Adaptive VSync | ||
CUDA | ||
FXAA | ||
GPU Boost | ||
SLI | ||
TXAA |