NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

  • Videocard is newer: launch date 4 year(s) 10 month(s) later
  • Around 48% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1006 MHz
  • Around 53% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1058 MHz
  • A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
  • 2.6x lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 195 Watt
  • 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2048 MB
  • Around 17% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 6008 MHz
  • Around 6% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5919 vs 5566
  • Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20687 vs 18397
  • Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 46.086
  • Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 4.645
  • 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 99.577
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 7222
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 3666
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 3306
  • Around 18% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 7222
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 3666
  • Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 3306
  • Around 17% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2340 vs 2004
Specifications (specs)
Launch date 1 February 2017 vs 22 March 2012
Core clock speed 1493 MHz vs 1006 MHz
Boost clock speed 1620 MHz vs 1058 MHz
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm vs 28 nm
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt vs 195 Watt
Maximum memory size 4 GB vs 2048 MB
Memory clock speed 7008 MHz vs 6008 MHz
Benchmarks
PassMark - G3D Mark 5919 vs 5566
Geekbench - OpenCL 20687 vs 18397
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 75.758 vs 46.086
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.071 vs 4.645
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 301.168 vs 99.577
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8496 vs 7222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3687 vs 3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3336 vs 3306
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8496 vs 7222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3687 vs 3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3336 vs 3306
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2340 vs 2004

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

  • Around 66% higher texture fill rate: 128.8 billion / sec vs 77.76 GTexel / s
  • 2x more pipelines: 1536 vs 768
  • Around 24% better floating-point performance: 3,090.4 gflops vs 2,488 gflops
  • Around 64% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 530 vs 323
  • Around 17% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 989.685 vs 843.503
  • Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 36.463 vs 24.676
Specifications (specs)
Texture fill rate 128.8 billion / sec vs 77.76 GTexel / s
Pipelines 1536 vs 768
Floating-point performance 3,090.4 gflops vs 2,488 gflops
Benchmarks
PassMark - G2D Mark 530 vs 323
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 989.685 vs 843.503
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 36.463 vs 24.676

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

PassMark - G3D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
5919
5566
PassMark - G2D Mark
GPU 1
GPU 2
323
530
Geekbench - OpenCL
GPU 1
GPU 2
20687
18397
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
75.758
46.086
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
843.503
989.685
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
5.071
4.645
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
24.676
36.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)
GPU 1
GPU 2
301.168
99.577
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8496
7222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3687
3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3336
3306
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
8496
7222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3687
3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)
GPU 1
GPU 2
3336
3306
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score
GPU 1
GPU 2
2340
2004
Name NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680
PassMark - G3D Mark 5919 5566
PassMark - G2D Mark 323 530
Geekbench - OpenCL 20687 18397
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) 75.758 46.086
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) 843.503 989.685
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) 5.071 4.645
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) 24.676 36.463
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) 301.168 99.577
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) 8496 7222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) 3687 3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) 3336 3306
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) 8496 7222
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) 3687 3666
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) 3336 3306
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score 2340 2004

Compare specifications (specs)

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680

Essentials

Architecture Pascal Kepler
Code name GP106B GK104
Launch date 1 February 2017 22 March 2012
Place in performance rating 563 560
Type Laptop Desktop
Launch price (MSRP) $499
Price now $579.99
Value for money (0-100) 12.83

Technical info

Boost clock speed 1620 MHz 1058 MHz
Core clock speed 1493 MHz 1006 MHz
Floating-point performance 2,488 gflops 3,090.4 gflops
Manufacturing process technology 16 nm 28 nm
Pipelines 768 1536
Texture fill rate 77.76 GTexel / s 128.8 billion / sec
Thermal Design Power (TDP) 75 Watt 195 Watt
Transistor count 4,400 million 3,540 million
CUDA cores 1536

Video outputs and ports

Display Connectors No outputs 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI...
G-SYNC support
Audio input for HDMI Internal
HDCP
HDMI
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Multi monitor support

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Laptop size large
Bus support PCI Express 3.0
Height 4.376" (11.1 cm)
Length 10.0" (25.4 cm)
SLI options 3-way
Supplementary power connectors Two 6-pin

API support

DirectX 12.0 (12_1) 12.0 (11_0)
OpenGL 4.6 4.2
Vulkan

Memory

Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2048 MB
Memory bandwidth 112.1 GB / s 192.2 GB / s
Memory bus width 128 Bit 256-bit GDDR5
Memory clock speed 7008 MHz 6008 MHz
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR5
Shared memory 0 0

Technologies

Multi Monitor
Multi-Projection
3D Vision
Adaptive VSync
CUDA
FXAA
GPU Boost
SLI
TXAA