NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) versus AMD Radeon R7 260
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and AMD Radeon R7 260 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 1 mois plus tard
- Environ 47% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1620 MHz versus 1100 MHz
- Environ 62% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 77.76 GTexel / s versus 48 GTexel / s
- Environ 62% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,488 gflops versus 1,536 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- Environ 53% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 75 Watt versus 115 Watt
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 4 GB versus 2 GB
- 4.3x plus de vitesse de mémoire: 7008 MHz versus 1625 MHz
- 2x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5919 versus 2892
- 2.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 versus 26.189
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 versus 798.239
- Environ 20% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 versus 4.223
- Environ 25% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 versus 240.395
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 versus 17 December 2013 |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz versus 1100 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.76 GTexel / s versus 48 GTexel / s |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,488 gflops versus 1,536 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt versus 115 Watt |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 4 GB versus 2 GB |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz versus 1625 MHz |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 versus 2892 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 versus 26.189 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 versus 798.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 versus 4.223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 versus 240.395 |
Raisons pour considerer le AMD Radeon R7 260
- Environ 73% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 559 versus 323
- Environ 84% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 45.294 versus 24.676
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 559 versus 323 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 45.294 versus 24.676 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R7 260
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | AMD Radeon R7 260 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5919 | 2892 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 559 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20121 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | 26.189 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | 798.239 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | 4.223 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | 45.294 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | 240.395 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2336 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | AMD Radeon R7 260 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
| Nom de code | GP106B | Bonaire |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 | 17 December 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 554 | 555 |
| Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
| Conception | AMD Radeon R7 200 Series | |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
| Prix maintenant | $89.99 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 44.11 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz | 1100 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz | |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,488 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 768 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.76 GTexel / s | 48 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 115 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 2,080 million |
| Stream Processors | 896 | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
| Soutien de DisplayPort | ||
| Soutien de Dual-link DVI | ||
| Eyefinity | ||
| HDMI | ||
| VGA | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Longeur | 170 mm | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | 1 x 6-pin | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.1 GB / s | 104 GB/s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | 1625 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| AMD Eyefinity | ||
| DDMA audio | ||
| FreeSync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 680
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 645 OEM
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDFirePro W5000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon R7 260
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000M
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
AMDRadeon RX 460 (Desktop)
