NVIDIA Quadro P600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA Quadro P600 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Quadro P600

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 40 Watt vs 75 Watt
• Around 65% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 533 vs 323
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3715 vs 3687
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3336
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3715 vs 3687
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3336

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

• Around 12% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1329 MHz
• Around 4% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1557 MHz
• 2.2x more texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 34.92 GTexel / s
• 2x more pipelines: 768 vs 384
• 2.2x better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 1,117 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 2 GB
• Around 75% higher memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 4012 MHz
• Around 78% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5919 vs 3317
• Around 85% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20720 vs 11181
• 2.2x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 35.134
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 141.164
• Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 4662
• Around 82% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 4662

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA Quadro P600
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	3317 5919
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	533 323
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	11181 20720
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	35.134 75.758
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	141.164 301.168
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4662 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3336
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	4662 8496
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3715 3687
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3336

Compare specifications (specs)