NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs Intel HD Graphics 4600

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and Intel HD Graphics 4600 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 3.7x more core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 400 MHz
• Around 30% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1250 MHz
• 15.6x more texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 5 GTexel / s
• 38.4x more pipelines: 768 vs 20
• 49.8x better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 50 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 22 nm
• 9.4x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5918 vs 630
• Around 3% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 323 vs 314
• 6.5x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 vs 3210
• 8.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 8.844
• 4.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 vs 171.17
• 4.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 1.115
• 2.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.676 vs 10.385
• 24.4x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 12.361
• 8.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 988
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 vs 1702
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 vs 2808
• 8.6x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 988
• 2.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 vs 1702
• Around 19% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 vs 2808
• 12.1x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2340 vs 194

Reasons to consider the Intel HD Graphics 4600

• Around 67% lower typical power consumption: 45 Watt vs 75 Watt

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5918 630
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	323 314
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	20732 3210
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.758 8.844
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	843.503 171.17
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.071 1.115
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.676 10.385
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	301.168 12.361
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 2808
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 988
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 1702
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 2808
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2340 194

Compare specifications (specs)