NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) versus Intel HD Graphics 4600
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and Intel HD Graphics 4600 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 7 mois plus tard
- 3.7x plus de vitesse du noyau: 1493 MHz versus 400 MHz
- Environ 30% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1620 MHz versus 1250 MHz
- times}x plus de taux de remplissage de la texture: 77.76 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s
- 38.4x plus de pipelines: 768 versus 20
- 49.8x de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,488 gflops versus 50 gflops
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 22 nm
- 9.4x meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5918 versus 630
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 323 versus 314
- 6.5x meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 versus 3210
- 8.6x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 versus 8.844
- 4.9x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 versus 171.17
- 4.5x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 versus 1.115
- 2.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 24.676 versus 10.385
- 24.4x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 versus 12.361
- 8.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 versus 988
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3687 versus 1702
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3336 versus 2808
- 8.6x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 versus 988
- 2.2x meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3687 versus 1702
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3336 versus 2808
- 12.1x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2340 versus 194
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 versus 3 June 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz versus 400 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz versus 1250 MHz |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.76 GTexel / s versus 5 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 768 versus 20 |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,488 gflops versus 50 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 22 nm |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5918 versus 630 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 versus 314 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 versus 3210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 versus 8.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 versus 171.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 versus 1.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 versus 10.385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 versus 12.361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 versus 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 versus 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 versus 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 versus 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 versus 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 versus 2808 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 versus 194 |
Raisons pour considerer le Intel HD Graphics 4600
- Environ 67% consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 45 Watt versus 75 Watt
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 45 Watt versus 75 Watt |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: Intel HD Graphics 4600
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | Intel HD Graphics 4600 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5918 | 630 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 314 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 | 3210 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | 8.844 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | 171.17 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | 1.115 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | 10.385 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | 12.361 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 2808 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 988 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 1702 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 2808 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 | 194 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | Intel HD Graphics 4600 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Generation 7.5 |
| Nom de code | GP106B | Haswell GT2 |
| Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 | 3 June 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 533 | 1359 |
| Genre | Laptop | Laptop |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz | 1250 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 2,488 gflops | 50 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 22 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 20 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.76 GTexel / s | 5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 45 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 392 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | No outputs |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 1.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 4 GB | |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.1 GB / s | |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 64 / 128 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | 1 |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| Quick Sync | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
ATIRadeon X850 XT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
ATIFireGL V7300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
ATIFireGL V3300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000
