NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 9 year(s) 3 month(s) later
- 2.3x more texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 33.6 billion / sec
- 6.9x more pipelines: 768 vs 112
- 7.4x better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 336.0 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 65 nm
- Around 40% lower typical power consumption: 75 Watt vs 105 Watt
- 8x more maximum memory size: 4 GB vs 512 MB
- 7.8x more memory clock speed: 7008 MHz vs 900 MHz
- 12.8x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5918 vs 463
- 6.6x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 323 vs 49
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 1 February 2017 vs 29 October 2007 |
| Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s vs 33.6 billion / sec |
| Pipelines | 768 vs 112 |
| Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops vs 336.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 65 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt vs 105 Watt |
| Maximum memory size | 4 GB vs 512 MB |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz vs 900 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5918 vs 463 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 vs 49 |
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz vs 1493 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3346 vs 3336 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3346 vs 3336 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 5918 | 463 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 49 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3346 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Tesla |
| Code name | GP106B | G92 |
| Launch date | 1 February 2017 | 29 October 2007 |
| Place in performance rating | 533 | 1399 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $349 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1620 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1493 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 2,488 gflops | 336.0 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 65 nm |
| Pipelines | 768 | 112 |
| Texture fill rate | 77.76 GTexel / s | 33.6 billion / sec |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 105 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 754 million |
| CUDA cores | 112 | |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 105 °C | |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video, Dual Link DVIHDTV |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Audio input for HDMI | S / PDIF | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| Length | 9" (22.9 cm) | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 112.1 GB / s | 57.6 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 7008 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| 3D Vision | ||
| CUDA | ||
| High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
ATIRadeon X850 XT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
ATIFireGL V7300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
ATIFireGL V3300
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAGeForce GT 740A
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro K5200
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs
NVIDIAQuadro M4000
