NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 month(s) later
• Around 16% higher core clock speed: 1493 MHz vs 1290 MHz
• Around 16% higher boost clock speed: 1620 MHz vs 1392 MHz
• Around 34% higher texture fill rate: 77.76 GTexel / s vs 58.2 GTexel / s
• Around 20% higher pipelines: 768 vs 640
• Around 34% better floating-point performance: 2,488 gflops vs 1,862 gflops
• Around 18% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 5918 vs 5029
• Around 19% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 vs 17466
• Around 13% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 vs 67.209
• Around 6% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 vs 799.414
• Around 12% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 vs 4.536
• Around 35% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 vs 223.683
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 vs 7043
• Around 21% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 vs 7043
• 19.2x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2340 vs 122

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 14 nm vs 16 nm
• Around 41% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 457 vs 323
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.523 vs 24.676
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 vs 3336
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 vs 3336

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	5918 5029
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	323 457
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	20732 17466
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	75.758 67.209
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	843.503 799.414
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	5.071 4.536
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	24.676 30.523
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	301.168 223.683
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3360
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8496 7043
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3687 3685
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3336 3360
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	2340 122

Compare specifications (specs)