NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) versus NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 mois plus tard
- Environ 16% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1493 MHz versus 1290 MHz
- Environ 16% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1620 MHz versus 1392 MHz
- Environ 34% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 77.76 GTexel / s versus 58.2 GTexel / s
- Environ 20% de pipelines plus haut: 768 versus 640
- Environ 34% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 2,488 gflops versus 1,862 gflops
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 5918 versus 5029
- Environ 19% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 20732 versus 17466
- Environ 13% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 75.758 versus 67.209
- Environ 6% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 843.503 versus 799.414
- Environ 12% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 5.071 versus 4.536
- Environ 35% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 301.168 versus 223.683
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 8496 versus 7043
- Environ 21% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 8496 versus 7043
- 19.2x meilleur performance en 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 2340 versus 122
Caractéristiques | |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 versus 25 October 2016 |
Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz versus 1290 MHz |
Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz versus 1392 MHz |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.76 GTexel / s versus 58.2 GTexel / s |
Pipelines | 768 versus 640 |
Performance á point flottant | 2,488 gflops versus 1,862 gflops |
Référence | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5918 versus 5029 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 versus 17466 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 versus 67.209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 versus 799.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 versus 4.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 versus 223.683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 versus 7043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 versus 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 versus 7043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 versus 3685 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 versus 122 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 14 nm versus 16 nm
- Environ 41% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 457 versus 323
- Environ 24% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 30.523 versus 24.676
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3360 versus 3336
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3360 versus 3336
Caractéristiques | |
Processus de fabrication | 14 nm versus 16 nm |
Référence | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 457 versus 323 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 30.523 versus 24.676 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3360 versus 3336 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3360 versus 3336 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop)
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
||||
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score |
|
|
Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 5918 | 5029 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 323 | 457 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 20732 | 17466 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 75.758 | 67.209 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 843.503 | 799.414 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 5.071 | 4.536 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 24.676 | 30.523 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 301.168 | 223.683 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 8496 | 7043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3687 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3336 | 3360 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 8496 | 7043 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3687 | 3685 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3336 | 3360 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 2340 | 122 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti (Notebook) | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 (Desktop) | |
---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
Nom de code | GP106B | GP107 |
Date de sortie | 1 February 2017 | 25 October 2016 |
Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 533 | 586 |
Genre | Laptop | Desktop |
Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $109 | |
Prix maintenant | $124.99 | |
Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 56.95 | |
Infos techniques |
||
Vitesse augmenté | 1620 MHz | 1392 MHz |
Vitesse du noyau | 1493 MHz | 1290 MHz |
Performance á point flottant | 2,488 gflops | 1,862 gflops |
Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 14 nm |
Pipelines | 768 | 640 |
Taux de remplissage de la texture | 77.76 GTexel / s | 58.2 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 75 Watt | 75 Watt |
Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 3,300 million |
Noyaux CUDA | 640 | |
Température maximale du GPU | 97 °C | |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort, DP 1.4, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI |
Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
HDCP | ||
Soutien de plusiers moniteurs | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Taille du laptop | large | |
Soutien de bus | PCIe 3.0 | |
Hauteur | 4.38" (11.1 cm) | |
Longeur | 5.7" (14.5 cm) | |
Énergie du systeme recommandé (PSU) | 300 Watt | |
Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | |
Largeur | 2-slot | |
Soutien API |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_1) |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
RAM maximale | 4 GB | 4 GB |
Bande passante de la mémoire | 112.1 GB / s | 112 GB / s |
Largeur du bus mémoire | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Vitesse de mémoire | 7008 MHz | 7008 MHz |
Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Mémoire partagé | 0 | 0 |
Technologies |
||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
VR Ready |