NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB vs NVIDIA Tesla K20m

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB and NVIDIA Tesla K20m videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

• Videocard is newer: launch date 3 year(s) 7 month(s) later
• 2.1x more core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 706 MHz
• Around 12% better floating-point performance: 3,935 gflops vs 3,524 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 88% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 225 Watt
• Around 54% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 5200 MHz
• 2.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9758 vs 4432
• 3.7x better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 777 vs 210
• 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 31449 vs 14510
• 2.1x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 115.073 vs 54.89
• Around 52% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.057 vs 5.303
• Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 425.709 vs 250.291
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10566 vs 8319
• Around 27% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10566 vs 8319

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA Tesla K20m

• Around 19% higher texture fill rate: 146.8 GTexel / s vs 123.0 GTexel / s
• 2.2x more pipelines: 2496 vs 1152
• Around 67% higher maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 3 GB
• Around 7% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1414.755 vs 1325.07
• 2.6x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 83.807 vs 31.946
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 7337 vs 3697
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 10873 vs 3338
• Around 98% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 7337 vs 3697
• 3.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 10873 vs 3338

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
GPU 2: NVIDIA Tesla K20m

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	9758 4432
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	777 210
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	31449 14510
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	115.073 54.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1325.07 1414.755
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.057 5.303
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	31.946 83.807
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	425.709 250.291
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10566 8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3697 7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3338 10873
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	10566 8319
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3697 7337
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3338 10873

Compare specifications (specs)