NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs AMD Radeon R9 370
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB and AMD Radeon R9 370 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s).
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- Around 63% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 925 MHz
- Around 75% higher boost clock speed: 1709 MHz vs 975 MHz
- Around 75% higher texture fill rate: 136.7 GTexel / s vs 78 GTexel / s
- Around 75% better floating-point performance: 4,375 gflops vs 2,496 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- 2.5x more maximum memory size: 5 GB vs 2 GB
- Around 43% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 5600 MHz
- Around 91% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9039 vs 4722
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 10818 vs 6096
- Around 77% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 10818 vs 6096
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 26 December 2017 vs 5 May 2015 |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 925 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1709 MHz vs 975 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 136.7 GTexel / s vs 78 GTexel / s |
| Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops vs 2,496 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 5 GB vs 2 GB |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 5600 MHz |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9039 vs 4722 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10818 vs 6096 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 vs 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10818 vs 6096 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 vs 3357 |
Reasons to consider the AMD Radeon R9 370
- Around 9% lower typical power consumption: 110 Watt vs 120 Watt
- Around 27% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 781 vs 614
- 2.2x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 75346 vs 33562
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3718 vs 3417
- Around 9% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3718 vs 3417
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 110 Watt vs 120 Watt |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 781 vs 614 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 75346 vs 33562 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3718 vs 3417 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3718 vs 3417 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
GPU 2: AMD Radeon R9 370
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB | AMD Radeon R9 370 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 9039 | 4722 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 614 | 781 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 33562 | 75346 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 10818 | 6096 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3417 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3358 | 3357 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 10818 | 6096 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3417 | 3718 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3358 | 3357 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3908 | 0 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 64.576 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 336.491 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB | AMD Radeon R9 370 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | GP106 | Trinidad |
| Launch date | 26 December 2017 | 5 May 2015 |
| Place in performance rating | 308 | 404 |
| Type | Desktop | Desktop |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1709 MHz | 975 MHz |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 925 MHz |
| Floating-point performance | 4,375 gflops | 2,496 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 1280 |
| Texture fill rate | 136.7 GTexel / s | 78 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 110 Watt |
| Transistor count | 4,400 million | 2,800 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | 250 mm | 221 mm |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.5 |
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 5 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory bandwidth | 160.2 GB / s | 179.2 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 160 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 5600 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs
ATIFireMV 2260
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs
AMDRadeon Pro WX 7100
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs
AMDRadeon Pro 580
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1650 (Laptop)
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 5 GB vs
AMDRadeon Pro W5500X
