NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 9 month(s) later
• Around 72% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 875 MHz
• Around 84% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 928 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 2.1x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 250 Watt
• 2x more maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 3 GB
• 1144x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 10% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 30868 vs 28119
• Around 48% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.55 vs 75.429
• Around 24% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.49 vs 6.854
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 509.222 vs 182.11
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 vs 10021
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 3342
• Around 26% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 vs 10021
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 3342
• Around 9% better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 3671 vs 3365

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

• Around 57% higher texture fill rate: 210 billion / sec vs 133.6 GTexel / s
• 2.3x more pipelines: 2880 vs 1280
• Around 25% better floating-point performance: 5,345 gflops vs 4,275 gflops
• Around 17% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 9528 vs 8161
• Around 43% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 633 vs 444
• Around 46% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2001.15 vs 1371.266
• 2.9x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 58.067 vs 19.803
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 3654
• Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 3654

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8161 9528
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	444 633
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	30868 28119
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	111.55 75.429
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1371.266 2001.15
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.49 6.854
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.803 58.067
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	509.222 182.11
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12645 10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3654 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3342
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12645 10021
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3654 3699
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 3342
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3671 3365

Compare specifications (specs)