NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) and NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 2 month(s) later
• 2.1x more core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 705 MHz
• Around 95% higher boost clock speed: 1708 MHz vs 876 MHz
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• 3.1x lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 375 Watt
• 1144x more memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 7.0 GB/s
• Around 36% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 30914 vs 22732
• Around 68% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.55 vs 66.419
• Around 9% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1371.266 vs 1261.593
• Around 8% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.49 vs 7.89
• Around 11% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 19.803 vs 17.882
• Around 64% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 509.222 vs 309.857
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 vs 8124
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3654 vs 2413
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 3359 vs 2226
• Around 56% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 vs 8124
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3654 vs 2413
• Around 51% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 3359 vs 2226

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

• 2.5x more texture fill rate: 338 billion / sec vs 133.6 GTexel / s
• 4.5x more pipelines: 2x 2880 vs 1280
• 2.4x better floating-point performance: 2x 5,046 gflops vs 4,275 gflops
• 2x more maximum memory size: 12 GB vs 6 GB
• Around 9% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8905 vs 8161
• Around 44% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 639 vs 444
• 4.6x better performance in 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score: 17055 vs 3671

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
GPU 2: NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8161 8905
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	444 639
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	30914 22732
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	111.55 66.419
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1371.266 1261.593
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.49 7.89
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.803 17.882
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	509.222 309.857
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12645 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3654 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 2226
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12645 8124
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3654 2413
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 2226
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score	GPU 1 GPU 2	3671 17055

Compare specifications (specs)