NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs AMD FirePro W4300

Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) and AMD FirePro W4300 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.

 

Differences

Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)

• Videocard is newer: launch date 8 month(s) later
• Around 62% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 930 MHz
• 3x more texture fill rate: 133.6 GTexel / s vs 44.64 GTexel / s
• Around 67% higher pipelines: 1280 vs 768
• 3x better floating-point performance: 4,275 gflops vs 1,428 gflops
• A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
• Around 50% higher maximum memory size: 6 GB vs 4 GB
• Around 33% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 6000 MHz
• 2.9x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8161 vs 2818
• 2.8x better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 29363 vs 10312
• 3.5x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.55 vs 31.528
• Around 65% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1371.266 vs 828.57
• 2.8x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.49 vs 2.985
• 3.3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 509.222 vs 152.484
• 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 vs 3572
• 3.5x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 vs 3572

Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W4300

• 2.4x lower typical power consumption: 50 Watt vs 120 Watt
• Around 48% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 659 vs 444
• 3x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 59.153 vs 19.803
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 6161 vs 3654
• 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames): 17597 vs 3359
• Around 69% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 6161 vs 3654
• 5.2x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps): 17597 vs 3359

Compare benchmarks

GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W4300

PassMark - G3D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	8161 2818
PassMark - G2D Mark	GPU 1 GPU 2	444 659
Geekbench - OpenCL	GPU 1 GPU 2	29363 10312
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	111.55 31.528
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	1371.266 828.57
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	8.49 2.985
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	19.803 59.153
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s)	GPU 1 GPU 2	509.222 152.484
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12645 3572
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3654 6161
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 17597
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	12645 3572
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3654 6161
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps)	GPU 1 GPU 2	3359 17597

Compare specifications (specs)