NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) vs AMD FirePro W8100
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) and AMD FirePro W8100 videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 2 year(s) 1 month(s) later
- Around 83% higher core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 824 MHz
- Around 1% higher texture fill rate: 133.6 GTexel / s vs 131.8 GTexel / s
- Around 1% better floating-point performance: 4,275 gflops vs 4,219 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 28 nm
- Around 83% lower typical power consumption: 120 Watt vs 220 Watt
- Around 60% higher memory clock speed: 8008 MHz vs 5000 MHz
- Around 20% better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 8160 vs 6812
- Around 20% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 111.55 vs 93.339
- Around 16% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 509.222 vs 440.107
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12645 vs 5494
- 2.3x better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12645 vs 5494
Specifications (specs) | |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 vs 23 June 2014 |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 824 MHz |
Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s vs 131.8 GTexel / s |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops vs 4,219 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 28 nm |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt vs 220 Watt |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz vs 5000 MHz |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8160 vs 6812 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 vs 93.339 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 vs 440.107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 vs 5494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 vs 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 vs 5494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 vs 3349 |
Reasons to consider the AMD FirePro W8100
- 2x more pipelines: 2560 vs 1280
- Around 33% higher maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 6 GB
- Around 70% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 755 vs 444
- Around 12% better performance in Geekbench - OpenCL: 34705 vs 31056
- Around 70% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 2333.922 vs 1371.266
- Around 4% better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.816 vs 8.49
- 5.7x better performance in CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 112.45 vs 19.803
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames): 3699 vs 3654
- Around 1% better performance in GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps): 3699 vs 3654
Specifications (specs) | |
Pipelines | 2560 vs 1280 |
Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 6 GB |
Benchmarks | |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 755 vs 444 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 34705 vs 31056 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 2333.922 vs 1371.266 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.816 vs 8.49 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 112.45 vs 19.803 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3699 vs 3654 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3699 vs 3654 |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop)
GPU 2: AMD FirePro W8100
PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | AMD FirePro W8100 |
---|---|---|
PassMark - G3D Mark | 8160 | 6812 |
PassMark - G2D Mark | 444 | 755 |
Geekbench - OpenCL | 31056 | 34705 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 111.55 | 93.339 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1371.266 | 2333.922 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.49 | 8.816 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 19.803 | 112.45 |
CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 509.222 | 440.107 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12645 | 5494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3654 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3349 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12645 | 5494 |
GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3654 | 3699 |
GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3349 |
3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3677 |
Compare specifications (specs)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 (Laptop) | AMD FirePro W8100 | |
---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
Architecture | Pascal | GCN 2.0 |
Code name | GP106B | Hawaii |
Launch date | 15 August 2016 | 23 June 2014 |
Launch price (MSRP) | $237.11 | |
Place in performance rating | 393 | 394 |
Price now | $229.99 | |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Value for money (0-100) | 49.49 | |
Technical info |
||
Boost clock speed | 1708 MHz | |
Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 824 MHz |
CUDA cores | 1280 | |
Floating-point performance | 4,275 gflops | 4,219 gflops |
Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 28 nm |
Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
Pipelines | 1280 | 2560 |
Texture fill rate | 133.6 GTexel / s | 131.8 GTexel / s |
Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 120 Watt | 220 Watt |
Transistor count | 4,400 million | 6,200 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
Display Connectors | DP 1.43, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 4x DisplayPort, 1x SDI |
G-SYNC support | ||
HDCP | ||
Multi monitor support | ||
DisplayPort count | 4 | |
Dual-link DVI support | ||
HD сomponent video output | ||
StereoOutput3D | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Laptop size | large | |
Form factor | Full Height / Full Length | |
Length | 279 mm | |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 6-pin | |
API support |
||
DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (12_0) |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
Maximum RAM amount | 6 GB | 8 GB |
Memory bandwidth | 192 GB / s | 320 GB / s |
Memory bus width | 192 Bit | 512 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8008 MHz | 5000 MHz |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
3D Vision | ||
Ansel | ||
CUDA | ||
DSR | ||
GameStream | ||
GPU Boost | ||
Multi Monitor | ||
Multi-Projection | ||
ShadowWorks | ||
Surround | ||
Virtual Reality | ||
VR Ready |