NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q versus NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Comparaison des cartes vidéo NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q and NVIDIA Quadro K6000 pour tous les caractéristiques connus dans les catégories suivants: Essentiel, Infos techniques, Sorties et ports de vidéo, Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences, Soutien API, Mémoire, Technologies. Analyse du performance de référence des cartes vidéo: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Différences
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
- La carte vidéo est plus nouvelle: date de sortie 3 ans 11 mois plus tard
- Environ 33% plus haut vitesse du noyau: 1063 MHz versus 797 MHz
- Environ 64% plus de la vitesse augmenté: 1480 MHz versus 902 MHz
- Un nouveau processus de fabrication soutient une carte vidéo plus forte, mais moins chaude: 16 nm versus 28 nm
- 2.8x consummation d’énergie moyen plus bas: 80 Watt versus 225 Watt
- Environ 33% plus haut de vitesse de mémoire: 8008 MHz versus 6008 MHz
- Environ 27% meilleur performance en Geekbench - OpenCL: 30314 versus 23926
- 2.2x meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s): 147.271 versus 67.178
- Environ 18% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s): 8.754 versus 7.435
- Environ 11% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s): 98.592 versus 88.889
- Environ 17% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s): 416.14 versus 355.166
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames): 12767 versus 12657
- Environ 1% meilleur performance en GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps): 12767 versus 12657
| Caractéristiques | |
| Date de sortie | 27 June 2017 versus 23 July 2013 |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1063 MHz versus 797 MHz |
| Vitesse augmenté | 1480 MHz versus 902 MHz |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm versus 28 nm |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt versus 225 Watt |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz versus 6008 MHz |
| Référence | |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 30314 versus 23926 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.271 versus 67.178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.754 versus 7.435 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.592 versus 88.889 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 416.14 versus 355.166 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12767 versus 12657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 versus 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 versus 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12767 versus 12657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 versus 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 versus 3356 |
Raisons pour considerer le NVIDIA Quadro K6000
- Environ 83% taux plus haut de remplissage de la texture: 216.5 GTexel / s versus 118.4 GTexel / s
- 2.3x plus de pipelines: 2880 versus 1280
- Environ 37% de meilleur performance á point flottant: 5,196 gflops versus 3,789 gflops
- 2x plus de taille maximale de mémoire : 12 GB versus 6 GB
- Environ 3% meilleur performance en PassMark - G3D Mark: 8040 versus 7817
- Environ 33% meilleur performance en PassMark - G2D Mark: 536 versus 402
- Environ 8% meilleur performance en CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s): 1816.61 versus 1681.162
| Caractéristiques | |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 216.5 GTexel / s versus 118.4 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2880 versus 1280 |
| Performance á point flottant | 5,196 gflops versus 3,789 gflops |
| Taille de mémore maximale | 12 GB versus 6 GB |
| Référence | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 8040 versus 7817 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 536 versus 402 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1816.61 versus 1681.162 |
Comparer les références
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q
GPU 2: NVIDIA Quadro K6000
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
||||
| Geekbench - OpenCL |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) |
|
|
||||
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) |
|
|
||||
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) |
|
|
| Nom | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 7817 | 8040 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 402 | 536 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 30314 | 23926 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 147.271 | 67.178 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1681.162 | 1816.61 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 8.754 | 7.435 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 98.592 | 88.889 |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 416.14 | 355.166 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 12767 | 12657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3712 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3359 | 3356 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 12767 | 12657 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3712 | 3711 |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3359 | 3356 |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 3316 |
Comparer les caractéristiques
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q | NVIDIA Quadro K6000 | |
|---|---|---|
Essentiel |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | Kepler |
| Nom de code | GP106 | GK110B |
| Date de sortie | 27 June 2017 | 23 July 2013 |
| Position dans l’évaluation de la performance | 375 | 372 |
| Genre | Laptop | Workstation |
| Prix de sortie (MSRP) | $5,265 | |
| Prix maintenant | $833.98 | |
| Valeur pour le prix (0-100) | 11.34 | |
Infos techniques |
||
| Vitesse augmenté | 1480 MHz | 902 MHz |
| Vitesse du noyau | 1063 MHz | 797 MHz |
| Performance á point flottant | 3,789 gflops | 5,196 gflops |
| Processus de fabrication | 16 nm | 28 nm |
| Pipelines | 1280 | 2880 |
| Taux de remplissage de la texture | 118.4 GTexel / s | 216.5 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 80 Watt | 225 Watt |
| Compte de transistor | 4,400 million | 7,080 million |
Sorties et ports de vidéo |
||
| Connecteurs d’écran | No outputs | 2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Soutien de G-SYNC | ||
Compatibilité, dimensions et exigences |
||
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Taille du laptop | large | |
| Connecteurs d’énergie supplementaires | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Longeur | 267 mm | |
Soutien API |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 12.0 (11_1) |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Vulkan | ||
Mémoire |
||
| RAM maximale | 6 GB | 12 GB |
| Bande passante de la mémoire | 192.2 GB / s | 288.4 GB / s |
| Largeur du bus mémoire | 192 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Vitesse de mémoire | 8008 MHz | 6008 MHz |
| Genre de mémoire | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Mémoire partagé | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choisir un GPU
Comparer les cartes vidéo
Comparer NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q avec des autres
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs
ATIRadeon X800 GT
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon HD 7730
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro K6000
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs
NVIDIATesla M6
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs
NVIDIAQuadro T1000 Max-Q
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1060 Max-Q vs
AMDRadeon RX 5300M
