NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
Comparative analysis of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) and ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View videocards for all known characteristics in the following categories: Essentials, Technical info, Video outputs and ports, Compatibility, dimensions and requirements, API support, Memory, Technologies. Benchmark videocards performance analysis: PassMark - G3D Mark, PassMark - G2D Mark, Geekbench - OpenCL, CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s), CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames), GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps), GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps), 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score.
Differences
Reasons to consider the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
- Videocard is newer: launch date 7 year(s) 7 month(s) later
- 2.5x more core clock speed: 1506 MHz vs 600 MHz
- 43.9x more texture fill rate: 210.6 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s
- 25.6x more pipelines: 2048 vs 80
- 70.2x better floating-point performance: 6,738 gflops vs 96 gflops
- A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running videocard: 16 nm vs 55 nm
- 16x more maximum memory size: 8 GB vs 512 MB
- 205.2x better performance in PassMark - G3D Mark: 10465 vs 51
- Around 25% better performance in PassMark - G2D Mark: 603 vs 482
| Specifications (specs) | |
| Launch date | 15 August 2016 vs 1 January 2009 |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz vs 600 MHz |
| Texture fill rate | 210.6 GTexel / s vs 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Pipelines | 2048 vs 80 |
| Floating-point performance | 6,738 gflops vs 96 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm vs 55 nm |
| Maximum memory size | 8 GB vs 512 MB |
| Benchmarks | |
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10465 vs 51 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 603 vs 482 |
Reasons to consider the ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
- 4.7x lower typical power consumption: 32 Watt vs 150 Watt
- 150x more memory clock speed: 1200 MHz vs 8 GB/s
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 32 Watt vs 150 Watt |
| Memory clock speed | 1200 MHz vs 8 GB/s |
Compare benchmarks
GPU 1: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop)
GPU 2: ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View
| PassMark - G3D Mark |
|
|
||||
| PassMark - G2D Mark |
|
|
| Name | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View |
|---|---|---|
| PassMark - G3D Mark | 10465 | 51 |
| PassMark - G2D Mark | 603 | 482 |
| Geekbench - OpenCL | 47331 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Face Detection (mPixels/s) | 150.951 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Ocean Surface Simulation (Frames/s) | 1718.593 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - T-Rex (Frames/s) | 12.283 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Video Composition (Frames/s) | 28.289 | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Desktop - Bitcoin Mining (mHash/s) | 710.366 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Frames) | 13765 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Frames) | 3691 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Frames) | 3340 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Car Chase Offscreen (Fps) | 13765 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - Manhattan (Fps) | 3691 | |
| GFXBench 4.0 - T-Rex (Fps) | 3340 | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike - Graphics Score | 5527 |
Compare specifications (specs)
| NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) | ATI FirePro 2450 Multi-View | |
|---|---|---|
Essentials |
||
| Architecture | Pascal | TeraScale |
| Code name | GP104B | RV620 |
| Launch date | 15 August 2016 | 1 January 2009 |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $389.99 | |
| Place in performance rating | 319 | 321 |
| Price now | $359.99 | |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Value for money (0-100) | 43.18 | |
Technical info |
||
| Boost clock speed | 1645 MHz | |
| Core clock speed | 1506 MHz | 600 MHz |
| CUDA cores | 1920 | |
| Floating-point performance | 6,738 gflops | 96 gflops |
| Manufacturing process technology | 16 nm | 55 nm |
| Maximum GPU temperature | 94 °C | |
| Pipelines | 2048 | 80 |
| Texture fill rate | 210.6 GTexel / s | 4.8 GTexel / s |
| Thermal Design Power (TDP) | 150 Watt | 32 Watt |
| Transistor count | 7,200 million | 181 million |
Video outputs and ports |
||
| Display Connectors | DP 1.42, HDMI 2.0b, Dual Link-DVI | 1x VHDCI |
| G-SYNC support | ||
| Multi monitor support | ||
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements |
||
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Length | 170 mm | |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
API support |
||
| DirectX | 12.0 (12_1) | 10.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
| Vulkan | ||
Memory |
||
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 512 MB |
| Memory bandwidth | 256 GB / s | 38.4 GB / s |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 8 GB/s | 1200 MHz |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Shared memory | 0 | |
Technologies |
||
| 3D Vision | ||
| Ansel | ||
| CUDA | ||
| GPU Boost | ||
| Multi Monitor | ||
| Multi-Projection | ||
| ShadowWorks | ||
| SLI | ||
| Virtual Reality | ||
| VR Ready | ||
Navigation
Choose a GPU
Compare videocards
Compare NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) with others
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro FX 370 LP
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro CX
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) vs
ATIFirePro 2450 Multi-View
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon R9 M390X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) vs
AMDRadeon R9 380X
NVIDIAGeForce GTX 1070 (Laptop) vs
NVIDIAQuadro P2200
